PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RMFGX vs. FSMDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RMFGX vs. FSMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Mutual Fund Class R-6 (RMFGX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMFGX achieves a 6.13% return, which is significantly lower than FSMDX's 12.00% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RMFGX having a 11.45% annualized return and FSMDX not far ahead at 11.61%.


RMFGX

1D
-0.51%
1M
1.78%
YTD
6.13%
6M
6.90%
1Y
17.42%
3Y*
15.62%
5Y*
10.54%
10Y*
11.45%

FSMDX

1D
0.15%
1M
3.17%
YTD
12.00%
6M
12.70%
1Y
22.46%
3Y*
17.31%
5Y*
8.15%
10Y*
11.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RMFGX vs. FSMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RMFGX
American Mutual Fund Class R-6
6.13%16.43%15.28%9.78%-4.19%25.28%5.15%21.92%-2.00%17.86%
FSMDX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund
12.00%10.58%15.55%17.20%-17.27%22.56%17.13%30.53%-9.38%18.04%

Correlation

The correlation between RMFGX and FSMDX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2011

0.90

The correlation between RMFGX and FSMDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RMFGX vs. FSMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMFGX
RMFGX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
RMFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
RMFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

FSMDX
FSMDX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
FSMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMFGX vs. FSMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Mutual Fund Class R-6 (RMFGX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RMFGXFSMDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.89

1.69

+0.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.65

2.44

+0.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.30

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

2.79

-0.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.30

10.78

-1.48

RMFGX vs. FSMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMFGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the FSMDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMFGX and FSMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RMFGXFSMDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

1.69

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.45

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.60

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.69

+0.13

Drawdowns

RMFGX vs. FSMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMFGX drawdown since its inception was -29.79%, smaller than the maximum FSMDX drawdown of -40.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMFGX and FSMDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RMFGXFSMDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.79%

-40.35%

+10.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.89%

-8.16%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.90%

-20.92%

+8.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.17%

-26.07%

+10.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.79%

-40.35%

+10.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

0.00%

-0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.72%

-4.96%

+2.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

2.11%

-0.15%

Volatility

RMFGX vs. FSMDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Mutual Fund Class R-6 (RMFGX) is 2.29%, while Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX) has a volatility of 3.28%. This indicates that RMFGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RMFGXFSMDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.29%

3.28%

-0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.34%

9.92%

-2.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.50%

13.43%

-3.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.51%

18.25%

-5.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.12%

19.32%

-5.20%

RMFGX vs. FSMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMFGX has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMDX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

RMFGX vs. FSMDX - Dividend Comparison

RMFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.43%, more than FSMDX's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSMDX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund
0.98%1.10%2.46%1.39%2.07%3.35%2.34%2.86%2.21%2.17%2.23%2.84%
RMFGX
American Mutual Fund Class R-6
7.43%7.85%6.59%4.06%5.20%4.88%2.30%4.89%6.75%6.23%4.54%6.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


RMFGX and FSMDX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSMDX has higher volatility (3.28%) compared to RMFGX (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMFGX dropped -29.79% vs FSMDX's -40.35%.

RMFGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RMFGX and FSMDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer