PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RLJ vs. FLKR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RLJ vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RLJ achieves a 70.90% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 74.91% return.


RLJ

1D
-0.88%
1M
5.93%
6M
61.78%
YTD
70.90%
1Y
79.12%
3Y*
14.67%
5Y*
0.84%
10Y*
-2.05%
ALL TIME*
2.18%

FLKR

1D
-0.75%
1M
-10.53%
6M
42.86%
YTD
74.91%
1Y
135.83%
3Y*
41.28%
5Y*
15.50%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$58.81M$52.63M$54.36M
$20.46M$20.93M$22.20M

RLJ vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RLJ
RLJ Lodging Trust
70.90%-21.01%-8.42%14.59%-23.12%-1.29%-19.81%16.53%-20.12%3.08%
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
74.91%91.91%-18.84%19.16%-27.50%-7.54%42.64%8.88%-21.30%3.00%

Correlation

The correlation between RLJ and FLKR is 0.16, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.34

The correlation between RLJ and FLKR shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RLJ vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RLJ
RLJ Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
RLJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RLJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
RLJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
RLJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
RLJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

FLKR
FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RLJ vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RLJFLKRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.39

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.49

4.00

+1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.57

13.70

+1.87

RLJ vs. FLKR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RLJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is comparable to the FLKR Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RLJ and FLKR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RLJ vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RLJ drawdown since its inception was -83.78%, which is greater than FLKR's maximum drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLJ and FLKR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RLJFLKRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.78%

-50.06%

-33.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.50%

-34.17%

+19.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.24%

-34.17%

-10.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.20%

-47.45%

-7.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.12%

-22.41%

-19.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.45%

-21.96%

-13.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.10%

9.95%

-4.85%

Volatility

RLJ vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) is 6.34%, while Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a volatility of 21.27%. This indicates that RLJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RLJFLKRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.34%

21.27%

-14.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.84%

50.66%

-29.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.56%

53.67%

-25.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.88%

32.31%

+0.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.05%

29.86%

+13.19%

Dividends

RLJ vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison

RLJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.87%, more than FLKR's 2.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
2.64%3.87%7.08%2.28%3.13%2.12%0.99%2.09%1.86%1.02%0.00%0.00%
RLJ
RLJ Lodging Trust
4.87%8.05%4.90%3.07%1.13%0.29%0.28%7.45%8.05%6.01%5.39%6.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


RLJ and FLKR have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLKR has higher volatility (21.27%) compared to RLJ (6.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RLJ dropped -83.78% vs FLKR's -50.06%.

RLJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RLJ and FLKR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer