PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RLJ vs. FHN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RLJ vs. FHN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) and First Horizon Corporation (FHN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RLJ achieves a 39.56% return, which is significantly higher than FHN's -0.37% return. Over the past 10 years, RLJ has underperformed FHN with an annualized return of -2.83%, while FHN has yielded a comparatively higher 8.71% annualized return.


RLJ

1D
0.99%
1M
22.04%
YTD
39.56%
6M
42.53%
1Y
50.48%
3Y*
3.63%
5Y*
-4.31%
10Y*
-2.83%

FHN

1D
-1.54%
1M
-4.06%
YTD
-0.37%
6M
5.47%
1Y
21.04%
3Y*
33.74%
5Y*
8.05%
10Y*
8.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RLJ vs. FHN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RLJ
RLJ Lodging Trust
39.56%-21.01%-8.42%14.59%-23.12%-1.29%-19.81%16.53%-20.12%-4.62%
FHN
First Horizon Corporation
-0.37%22.12%47.68%-39.44%53.94%32.61%-18.45%30.48%-32.35%1.93%

Correlation

The correlation between RLJ and FHN is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2011

0.45

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RLJ:

$1.52B

FHN:

$11.51B

EPS

RLJ:

$0.17

FHN:

$2.05

PE Ratio

RLJ:

61.35

FHN:

11.54

PEG Ratio

RLJ:

10.58

FHN:

3.24

PS Ratio

RLJ:

1.12

FHN:

2.58

PB Ratio

RLJ:

0.71

FHN:

1.37

Total Revenue (TTM)

RLJ:

$1.36B

FHN:

$4.60B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RLJ:

$19.43M

FHN:

$3.40B

EBITDA (TTM)

RLJ:

$321.42M

FHN:

$1.40B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RLJ Lodging Trust

First Horizon Corporation

Return for Risk

RLJ vs. FHN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RLJ
RLJ Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
RLJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RLJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
RLJ Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
RLJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
RLJ Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

FHN
FHN Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FHN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHN Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FHN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHN Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RLJ vs. FHN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) and First Horizon Corporation (FHN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RLJFHNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.77

0.82

+0.95

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.57

1.19

+1.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.16

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.47

1.28

+2.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.18

3.19

+6.00

RLJ vs. FHN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RLJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the FHN Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RLJ and FHN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RLJFHNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

0.82

+0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

0.22

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.07

0.22

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

0.28

-0.27

Drawdowns

RLJ vs. FHN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RLJ drawdown since its inception was -83.78%, roughly equal to the maximum FHN drawdown of -87.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLJ and FHN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RLJFHNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.78%

-87.74%

+3.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.61%

-16.52%

+1.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.24%

-27.14%

-17.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.59%

-60.76%

+4.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.52%

-64.25%

-15.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.73%

-9.22%

-43.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.34%

-20.08%

-15.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.52%

6.62%

-1.10%

Volatility

RLJ vs. FHN - Volatility Comparison

RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) has a higher volatility of 8.21% compared to First Horizon Corporation (FHN) at 6.47%. This indicates that RLJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RLJFHNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.21%

6.47%

+1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.91%

17.27%

+3.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.71%

25.80%

+2.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.24%

37.14%

-3.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.11%

38.99%

+4.12%

Dividends

RLJ vs. FHN - Dividend Comparison

RLJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.89%, more than FHN's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHN
First Horizon Corporation
2.62%2.51%2.98%4.24%2.45%3.67%4.70%3.38%3.65%1.80%1.40%1.65%
RLJ
RLJ Lodging Trust
5.89%8.05%4.90%3.07%1.13%0.29%0.28%7.45%8.05%6.01%5.39%6.10%

Financials

RLJ vs. FHN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between RLJ Lodging Trust and First Horizon Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
339.98M
862.00M
(RLJ) Total Revenue
(FHN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RLJ vs. FHN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between RLJ Lodging Trust and First Horizon Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-100.0%-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
33.8%
100.0%
Portfolio components
RLJ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RLJ Lodging Trust reported a gross profit of 114.98M and revenue of 339.98M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.8%.

FHN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Horizon Corporation reported a gross profit of 862.00M and revenue of 862.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

RLJ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RLJ Lodging Trust reported an operating income of 27.84M and revenue of 339.98M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.2%.

FHN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Horizon Corporation reported an operating income of 357.00M and revenue of 862.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 41.4%.

RLJ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RLJ Lodging Trust reported a net income of -349.00K and revenue of 339.98M, resulting in a net margin of -0.1%.

FHN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Horizon Corporation reported a net income of 263.00M and revenue of 862.00M, resulting in a net margin of 30.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RLJ and FHN have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RLJ has higher volatility (8.21%) compared to FHN (6.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RLJ dropped -83.78% vs FHN's -87.74%.

RLJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RLJ and FHN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer