PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RLJ vs. EPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RLJ vs. EPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) and EPR Properties (EPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RLJ achieves a 55.59% return, which is significantly higher than EPR's 19.56% return. Over the past 10 years, RLJ has underperformed EPR with an annualized return of -1.60%, while EPR has yielded a comparatively higher 3.21% annualized return.


RLJ

1D
-0.61%
1M
18.58%
YTD
55.59%
6M
51.75%
1Y
71.26%
3Y*
11.59%
5Y*
-2.33%
10Y*
-1.60%

EPR

1D
0.92%
1M
-0.46%
YTD
19.56%
6M
20.05%
1Y
6.35%
3Y*
18.12%
5Y*
9.27%
10Y*
3.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RLJ vs. EPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RLJ
RLJ Lodging Trust
55.59%-21.01%-8.42%14.59%-23.12%-1.29%-19.81%16.53%-20.12%-4.62%
EPR
EPR Properties
19.56%20.52%-1.25%38.83%-14.61%50.60%-52.09%17.13%3.59%-3.41%

Correlation

The correlation between RLJ and EPR is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2011

0.52

The correlation between RLJ and EPR shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.52 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RLJ:

$1.70B

EPR:

$4.44B

EPS

RLJ:

$0.17

EPR:

$3.55

PE Ratio

RLJ:

68.39

EPR:

16.35

PEG Ratio

RLJ:

11.80

EPR:

0.35

PS Ratio

RLJ:

1.25

EPR:

6.35

PB Ratio

RLJ:

0.79

EPR:

1.92

Total Revenue (TTM)

RLJ:

$1.36B

EPR:

$700.22M

Gross Profit (TTM)

RLJ:

$19.43M

EPR:

$568.77M

EBITDA (TTM)

RLJ:

$321.42M

EPR:

$582.57M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RLJ vs. EPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RLJ
RLJ Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
RLJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RLJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
RLJ Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
RLJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
RLJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

EPR
EPR Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
EPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPR Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
EPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPR Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RLJ vs. EPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) and EPR Properties (EPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RLJEPRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.07

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.90

0.33

+4.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.02

0.65

+12.37

RLJ vs. EPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RLJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is higher than the EPR Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RLJ and EPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RLJ vs. EPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RLJ drawdown since its inception was -83.78%, roughly equal to the maximum EPR drawdown of -82.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLJ and EPR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RLJEPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.78%

-82.02%

-1.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.61%

-19.51%

+4.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.24%

-19.51%

-24.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.20%

-35.63%

-19.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.52%

-82.02%

+2.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.31%

-3.02%

-44.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.37%

-16.57%

-18.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.49%

9.82%

-4.33%

Volatility

RLJ vs. EPR - Volatility Comparison

RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) has a higher volatility of 7.18% compared to EPR Properties (EPR) at 6.12%. This indicates that RLJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RLJEPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.18%

6.12%

+1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.17%

16.84%

+4.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.82%

22.65%

+6.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.25%

26.14%

+7.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.14%

42.48%

+0.66%

Dividends

RLJ vs. EPR - Dividend Comparison

RLJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.28%, less than EPR's 6.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EPR
EPR Properties
6.18%7.05%7.68%6.81%8.62%3.16%4.66%6.37%5.62%6.23%5.35%6.21%
RLJ
RLJ Lodging Trust
5.28%8.05%4.90%3.07%1.13%0.29%0.28%7.45%8.05%6.01%5.39%6.10%

Financials

RLJ vs. EPR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between RLJ Lodging Trust and EPR Properties. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M350.00M20222023202420252026
339.98M
181.25M
(RLJ) Total Revenue
(EPR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RLJ vs. EPR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between RLJ Lodging Trust and EPR Properties over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-100.0%-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
33.8%
99.8%
Portfolio components
RLJ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RLJ Lodging Trust reported a gross profit of 114.98M and revenue of 339.98M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.8%.

EPR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EPR Properties reported a gross profit of 180.96M and revenue of 181.25M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 99.8%.

RLJ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RLJ Lodging Trust reported an operating income of 27.84M and revenue of 339.98M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.2%.

EPR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EPR Properties reported an operating income of 100.62M and revenue of 181.25M, resulting in an operating margin of 55.5%.

RLJ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RLJ Lodging Trust reported a net income of -349.00K and revenue of 339.98M, resulting in a net margin of -0.1%.

EPR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EPR Properties reported a net income of 62.61M and revenue of 181.25M, resulting in a net margin of 34.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RLJ and EPR have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RLJ has higher volatility (7.18%) compared to EPR (6.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RLJ dropped -83.78% vs EPR's -82.02%.

RLJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RLJ and EPR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer