PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RLGT vs. AOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RLGT vs. AOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Radiant Logistics, Inc. (RLGT) and A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RLGT achieves a 33.49% return, which is significantly higher than AOS's -14.27% return. Over the past 10 years, RLGT has outperformed AOS with an annualized return of 9.83%, while AOS has yielded a comparatively lower 5.11% annualized return.


RLGT

1D
-1.74%
1M
10.60%
YTD
33.49%
6M
31.01%
1Y
37.85%
3Y*
9.42%
5Y*
2.55%
10Y*
9.83%

AOS

1D
-0.05%
1M
-3.62%
YTD
-14.27%
6M
-14.83%
1Y
-9.49%
3Y*
-4.15%
5Y*
-1.99%
10Y*
5.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RLGT vs. AOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RLGT
Radiant Logistics, Inc.
33.49%-5.52%0.90%30.45%-30.18%25.69%4.13%31.06%-7.61%17.95%
AOS
A. O. Smith Corporation
-14.27%0.07%-15.92%47.30%-32.07%59.28%17.46%13.65%-29.35%30.78%

Correlation

The correlation between RLGT and AOS is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2006

0.23

The correlation between RLGT and AOS shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.41 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RLGT:

$410.18M

AOS:

$7.89B

EPS

RLGT:

$0.33

AOS:

$3.75

PE Ratio

RLGT:

25.42

AOS:

15.13

PEG Ratio

RLGT:

0.91

AOS:

0.62

PS Ratio

RLGT:

0.46

AOS:

2.09

PB Ratio

RLGT:

1.75

AOS:

3.66

Total Revenue (TTM)

RLGT:

$893.50M

AOS:

$3.81B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RLGT:

$113.69M

AOS:

$1.48B

EBITDA (TTM)

RLGT:

$27.72M

AOS:

$794.70M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RLGT vs. AOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RLGT
RLGT Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
RLGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RLGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
RLGT Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
RLGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
RLGT Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

AOS
AOS Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
AOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOS Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
AOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOS Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RLGT vs. AOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Radiant Logistics, Inc. (RLGT) and A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RLGTAOSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

0.95

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

-0.31

+2.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.71

-0.77

+5.48

RLGT vs. AOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RLGT Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is higher than the AOS Sharpe Ratio of -0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RLGT and AOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RLGTAOSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

-0.39

+1.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

-0.07

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

0.19

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.42

-0.25

Drawdowns

RLGT vs. AOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RLGT drawdown since its inception was -92.68%, which is greater than AOS's maximum drawdown of -66.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLGT and AOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RLGTAOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.68%

-66.07%

-26.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.44%

-30.29%

+12.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.53%

-36.93%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.29%

-42.68%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.67%

-46.81%

-9.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.42%

-35.86%

+33.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.91%

-20.47%

-12.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.08%

12.30%

-4.22%

Volatility

RLGT vs. AOS - Volatility Comparison

Radiant Logistics, Inc. (RLGT) has a higher volatility of 13.03% compared to A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS) at 7.88%. This indicates that RLGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RLGTAOSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.03%

7.88%

+5.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.88%

18.90%

+11.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.17%

24.73%

+13.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.38%

27.07%

+11.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.09%

27.06%

+17.03%

Dividends

RLGT vs. AOS - Dividend Comparison

RLGT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AOS
A. O. Smith Corporation
2.50%2.06%1.91%1.84%1.99%1.23%1.79%1.89%1.78%0.91%1.01%0.99%
RLGT
Radiant Logistics, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

RLGT vs. AOS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Radiant Logistics, Inc. and A. O. Smith Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B20222023202420252026
214.14M
945.60M
(RLGT) Total Revenue
(AOS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RLGT vs. AOS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Radiant Logistics, Inc. and A. O. Smith Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%202220232024202520260
38.7%
Portfolio components
RLGT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Radiant Logistics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 214.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

AOS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, A. O. Smith Corporation reported a gross profit of 365.70M and revenue of 945.60M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.7%.

RLGT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Radiant Logistics, Inc. reported an operating income of 6.55M and revenue of 214.14M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.1%.

AOS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, A. O. Smith Corporation reported an operating income of 161.80M and revenue of 945.60M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.1%.

RLGT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Radiant Logistics, Inc. reported a net income of 4.67M and revenue of 214.14M, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.

AOS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, A. O. Smith Corporation reported a net income of 118.00M and revenue of 945.60M, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RLGT and AOS have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RLGT has higher volatility (13.03%) compared to AOS (7.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RLGT dropped -92.68% vs AOS's -66.07%.

RLGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RLGT and AOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer