PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RLGT vs. ABBV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RLGT vs. ABBV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Radiant Logistics, Inc. (RLGT) and AbbVie Inc. (ABBV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RLGT achieves a 33.49% return, which is significantly higher than ABBV's -3.41% return. Over the past 10 years, RLGT has underperformed ABBV with an annualized return of 9.83%, while ABBV has yielded a comparatively higher 17.56% annualized return.


RLGT

1D
-1.74%
1M
10.60%
YTD
33.49%
6M
31.01%
1Y
37.85%
3Y*
9.42%
5Y*
2.55%
10Y*
9.83%

ABBV

1D
0.80%
1M
4.31%
YTD
-3.41%
6M
-4.15%
1Y
19.73%
3Y*
20.88%
5Y*
18.44%
10Y*
17.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RLGT vs. ABBV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RLGT
Radiant Logistics, Inc.
33.49%-5.52%0.90%30.45%-30.18%25.69%4.13%31.06%-7.61%17.95%
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
-3.41%33.08%18.86%-0.23%24.01%32.43%27.72%1.47%-0.96%60.07%

Correlation

The correlation between RLGT and ABBV is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.16

The correlation between RLGT and ABBV shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (1 year) to 0.16 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RLGT:

$410.18M

ABBV:

$385.19B

EPS

RLGT:

$0.33

ABBV:

$2.05

PE Ratio

RLGT:

25.42

ABBV:

105.79

PS Ratio

RLGT:

0.46

ABBV:

6.13

PB Ratio

RLGT:

1.75

ABBV:

14.01

Total Revenue (TTM)

RLGT:

$893.50M

ABBV:

$62.82B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RLGT:

$113.69M

ABBV:

$46.15B

EBITDA (TTM)

RLGT:

$27.72M

ABBV:

$17.96B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RLGT vs. ABBV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RLGT
RLGT Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
RLGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RLGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
RLGT Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
RLGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
RLGT Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

ABBV
ABBV Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
ABBV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABBV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABBV Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
ABBV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABBV Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RLGT vs. ABBV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Radiant Logistics, Inc. (RLGT) and AbbVie Inc. (ABBV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RLGTABBVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.16

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

1.14

+1.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.71

2.57

+2.14

RLGT vs. ABBV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RLGT Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is comparable to the ABBV Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RLGT and ABBV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RLGTABBVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

0.83

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

0.81

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

0.68

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.73

-0.56

Drawdowns

RLGT vs. ABBV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RLGT drawdown since its inception was -92.68%, which is greater than ABBV's maximum drawdown of -45.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLGT and ABBV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RLGTABBVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.68%

-45.09%

-47.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.44%

-17.32%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.53%

-20.74%

-15.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.29%

-21.92%

-21.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.67%

-45.09%

-11.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.42%

-9.04%

+6.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.91%

-10.73%

-22.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.08%

7.69%

+0.39%

Volatility

RLGT vs. ABBV - Volatility Comparison

Radiant Logistics, Inc. (RLGT) has a higher volatility of 13.03% compared to AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) at 5.42%. This indicates that RLGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABBV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RLGTABBVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.03%

5.42%

+7.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.88%

17.61%

+13.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.17%

23.96%

+14.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.38%

22.84%

+15.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.09%

25.74%

+18.35%

Dividends

RLGT vs. ABBV - Dividend Comparison

RLGT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ABBV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
3.10%2.87%3.49%3.82%3.49%3.84%4.41%4.83%3.89%2.65%3.64%3.41%
RLGT
Radiant Logistics, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

RLGT vs. ABBV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Radiant Logistics, Inc. and AbbVie Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
214.14M
15.00B
(RLGT) Total Revenue
(ABBV) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RLGT vs. ABBV - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Radiant Logistics, Inc. and AbbVie Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%202220232024202520260
83.5%
Portfolio components
RLGT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Radiant Logistics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 214.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ABBV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported a gross profit of 12.53B and revenue of 15.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.5%.

RLGT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Radiant Logistics, Inc. reported an operating income of 6.55M and revenue of 214.14M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.1%.

ABBV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported an operating income of 4.73B and revenue of 15.00B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.6%.

RLGT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Radiant Logistics, Inc. reported a net income of 4.67M and revenue of 214.14M, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.

ABBV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported a net income of 699.00M and revenue of 15.00B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RLGT and ABBV have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RLGT has higher volatility (13.03%) compared to ABBV (5.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RLGT dropped -92.68% vs ABBV's -45.09%.

RLGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RLGT and ABBV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer