RLGT vs. VT

In the year-to-date period, RLGT achieves a -11.34% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 5.36% return. Over the past 10 years, RLGT has underperformed VT with an annualized return of -0.08%, while VT has yielded a comparatively higher 9.24% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Radiant Logistics, Inc. (RLGT) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current RLGT Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the VT Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RLGT and VT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

RLGT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%.

The maximum RLGT drawdown since its inception was -92.68%, which is greater than VT's maximum drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLGT and VT.

Radiant Logistics, Inc. (RLGT) has a higher volatility of 9.49% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 3.82%. This indicates that RLGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.