RLGT vs. NNN
RLGT (Radiant Logistics, Inc.) and NNN (NNN REIT, Inc.) are both stocks. RLGT operates in Integrated Freight & Logistics (Industrials), while NNN operates in REIT - Retail (Real Estate). Over the past 10 years, RLGT returned 11.36%/yr vs 4.61%/yr for NNN. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RLGT vs. NNN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RLGT achieves a 50.08% return, which is significantly higher than NNN's 27.77% return. Over the past 10 years, RLGT has outperformed NNN with an annualized return of 11.36%, while NNN has yielded a comparatively lower 4.61% annualized return.
RLGT
- 1D
- 1.82%
- 1M
- 4.74%
- 6M
- 39.91%
- YTD
- 50.08%
- 1Y
- 58.33%
- 3Y*
- 8.54%
- 5Y*
- 7.72%
- 10Y*
- 11.36%
NNN
- 1D
- 3.80%
- 1M
- 6.63%
- 6M
- 19.96%
- YTD
- 27.77%
- 1Y
- 20.82%
- 3Y*
- 10.51%
- 5Y*
- 5.77%
- 10Y*
- 4.61%
RLGT vs. NNN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RLGT Radiant Logistics, Inc. | 50.08% | -5.52% | 0.90% | 30.45% | -30.18% | 25.69% | 4.13% | 31.06% | -7.61% | 17.95% |
NNN NNN REIT, Inc. | 27.77% | 2.81% | -0.06% | -0.60% | -0.01% | 23.08% | -19.29% | 14.78% | 17.82% | 2.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between RLGT and NNN is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2006 | 0.11 |
The correlation between RLGT and NNN shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.23 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RLGT:
$444.90M
NNN:
$9.36B
RLGT:
$0.33
NNN:
$2.05
RLGT:
28.57
NNN:
24.02
RLGT:
1.02
NNN:
2.72
RLGT:
0.52
NNN:
9.94
RLGT:
1.97
NNN:
2.12
RLGT:
$893.50M
NNN:
$935.78M
RLGT:
$113.69M
NNN:
$761.54M
RLGT:
$27.72M
NNN:
$870.06M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RLGT vs. NNN — Risk / Return Rank
RLGT
NNN
RLGT vs. NNN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Radiant Logistics, Inc. (RLGT) and NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RLGT | NNN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.21 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.36 | 2.43 | +0.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.27 | 5.79 | +1.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RLGT vs. NNN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RLGT drawdown since its inception was -92.68%, which is greater than NNN's maximum drawdown of -56.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLGT and NNN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RLGT | NNN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.68% | -56.17% | -36.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.44% | -8.60% | -8.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.53% | -22.03% | -14.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.29% | -25.22% | -18.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.67% | -54.99% | -1.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.14% | 0.00% | -1.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.72% | -9.79% | -22.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.04% | 3.61% | +4.43% |
Volatility
RLGT vs. NNN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Radiant Logistics, Inc. (RLGT) is 5.92%, while NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) has a volatility of 6.55%. This indicates that RLGT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NNN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RLGT | NNN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.92% | 6.55% | -0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.83% | 12.59% | +18.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.23% | 17.18% | +21.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.34% | 19.77% | +18.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.02% | 28.12% | +15.90% |
Dividends
RLGT vs. NNN - Dividend Comparison
RLGT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NNN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NNN NNN REIT, Inc. | 4.88% | 5.96% | 5.61% | 5.17% | 4.72% | 4.37% | 5.06% | 3.79% | 4.02% | 4.31% | 4.03% | 4.27% |
RLGT Radiant Logistics, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
RLGT vs. NNN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Radiant Logistics, Inc. and NNN REIT, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RLGT vs. NNN - Profitability Comparison
RLGT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Radiant Logistics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 214.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
NNN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, NNN REIT, Inc. reported a gross profit of 230.63M and revenue of 240.42M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.9%.
RLGT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Radiant Logistics, Inc. reported an operating income of 6.55M and revenue of 214.14M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.1%.
NNN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, NNN REIT, Inc. reported an operating income of 146.65M and revenue of 240.42M, resulting in an operating margin of 61.0%.
RLGT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Radiant Logistics, Inc. reported a net income of 4.67M and revenue of 214.14M, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.
NNN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, NNN REIT, Inc. reported a net income of 93.95M and revenue of 240.42M, resulting in a net margin of 39.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RLGT and NNN have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NNN has higher volatility (6.55%) compared to RLGT (5.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RLGT dropped -92.68% vs NNN's -56.17%.
RLGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RLGT and NNN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer