AOS vs. AFL
Compare and contrast key facts about A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS) and Aflac Incorporated (AFL).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AOS or AFL.
Correlation
The correlation between AOS and AFL is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
AOS vs. AFL - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
AOS:
-0.37
AFL:
1.52
AOS:
-0.35
AFL:
1.89
AOS:
0.95
AFL:
1.31
AOS:
-0.34
AFL:
2.50
AOS:
-0.74
AFL:
6.66
AOS:
12.02%
AFL:
4.71%
AOS:
24.01%
AFL:
20.63%
AOS:
-66.52%
AFL:
-82.71%
AOS:
-21.28%
AFL:
-7.19%
Fundamentals
AOS:
$10.35B
AFL:
$59.16B
AOS:
$3.81
AFL:
$6.76
AOS:
18.85
AFL:
15.75
AOS:
1.80
AFL:
0.93
AOS:
$2.91B
AFL:
$13.52B
AOS:
$1.12B
AFL:
$13.52B
AOS:
$619.70M
AFL:
$45.00M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AOS achieves a 5.28% return, which is significantly higher than AFL's 2.95% return. Over the past 10 years, AOS has underperformed AFL with an annualized return of 11.78%, while AFL has yielded a comparatively higher 16.55% annualized return.
AOS
5.28%
4.50%
-18.47%
-10.15%
11.21%
11.78%
AFL
2.95%
3.70%
13.74%
28.94%
18.10%
16.55%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AOS vs. AFL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
AOS
AFL
AOS vs. AFL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS) and Aflac Incorporated (AFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AOS vs. AFL - Dividend Comparison
AOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, less than AFL's 1.88% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOS A. O. Smith Corporation | 1.81% | 1.91% | 1.84% | 1.99% | 1.23% | 1.79% | 1.89% | 1.78% | 0.91% | 1.01% | 0.99% | 1.06% |
AFL Aflac Incorporated | 1.88% | 1.93% | 2.04% | 2.22% | 2.26% | 2.52% | 2.04% | 2.28% | 1.98% | 2.39% | 2.64% | 2.46% |
Drawdowns
AOS vs. AFL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOS drawdown since its inception was -66.52%, smaller than the maximum AFL drawdown of -82.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOS and AFL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AOS vs. AFL - Volatility Comparison
A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS) has a higher volatility of 6.31% compared to Aflac Incorporated (AFL) at 5.36%. This indicates that AOS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
AOS vs. AFL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between A. O. Smith Corporation and Aflac Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities