Correlation
The correlation between AOS and FANG is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
AOS vs. FANG
Compare and contrast key facts about A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AOS or FANG.
Performance
AOS vs. FANG - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
AOS:
-0.76
FANG:
-0.76
AOS:
-0.96
FANG:
-0.91
AOS:
0.88
FANG:
0.88
AOS:
-0.60
FANG:
-0.71
AOS:
-1.05
FANG:
-1.48
AOS:
19.75%
FANG:
20.16%
AOS:
26.76%
FANG:
39.15%
AOS:
-66.52%
FANG:
-88.72%
AOS:
-28.78%
FANG:
-34.21%
Fundamentals
AOS:
$9.13B
FANG:
$40.26B
AOS:
$3.61
FANG:
$16.26
AOS:
17.93
FANG:
8.48
AOS:
1.68
FANG:
1.20
AOS:
2.40
FANG:
3.28
AOS:
4.92
FANG:
1.05
AOS:
$3.80B
FANG:
$12.86B
AOS:
$1.45B
FANG:
$6.94B
AOS:
$768.80M
FANG:
$8.96B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AOS achieves a -4.76% return, which is significantly higher than FANG's -16.72% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AOS having a 7.85% annualized return and FANG not far ahead at 8.06%.
AOS
-4.76%
-5.23%
-12.79%
-20.18%
4.30%
8.26%
7.85%
FANG
-16.72%
2.63%
-23.17%
-29.68%
0.88%
31.47%
8.06%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AOS vs. FANG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
AOS
FANG
AOS vs. FANG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
AOS vs. FANG - Dividend Comparison
AOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than FANG's 3.89% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOS A. O. Smith Corporation | 2.08% | 1.91% | 1.84% | 1.99% | 1.23% | 1.79% | 1.89% | 1.78% | 0.91% | 1.01% | 0.99% | 1.06% |
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 3.89% | 5.06% | 5.15% | 6.55% | 1.62% | 3.10% | 0.74% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
AOS vs. FANG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOS drawdown since its inception was -66.52%, smaller than the maximum FANG drawdown of -88.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOS and FANG.
Loading data...
Volatility
AOS vs. FANG - Volatility Comparison
A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS) has a higher volatility of 9.84% compared to Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) at 9.09%. This indicates that AOS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FANG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...
Financials
AOS vs. FANG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between A. O. Smith Corporation and Diamondback Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AOS vs. FANG - Profitability Comparison
AOS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, A. O. Smith Corporation reported a gross profit of 375.40M and revenue of 963.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.0%.
FANG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.81B and revenue of 4.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.0%.
AOS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, A. O. Smith Corporation reported an operating income of 182.80M and revenue of 963.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.0%.
FANG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.67B and revenue of 4.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.5%.
AOS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, A. O. Smith Corporation reported a net income of 136.60M and revenue of 963.90M, resulting in a net margin of 14.2%.
FANG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 1.41B and revenue of 4.03B, resulting in a net margin of 34.9%.