AOS vs. FANG
Compare and contrast key facts about A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG).
Performance
AOS vs. FANG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AOS vs. FANG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOS A. O. Smith Corporation | -2.21% | 0.07% | -15.92% | 47.30% | -32.07% | 59.28% | 17.46% | 13.65% | -29.35% | 30.78% |
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 27.56% | -5.64% | 10.35% | 19.66% | 35.34% | 127.51% | -46.00% | 0.92% | -26.35% | 24.93% |
Fundamentals
AOS:
$9.11B
FANG:
$54.48B
AOS:
$3.87
FANG:
$5.75
AOS:
16.83
FANG:
33.15
AOS:
2.40
FANG:
3.68
AOS:
4.27
FANG:
1.47
AOS:
$3.83B
FANG:
$14.98B
AOS:
$1.49B
FANG:
$7.48B
AOS:
$792.20M
FANG:
$7.31B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AOS achieves a -2.21% return, which is significantly lower than FANG's 27.56% return. Over the past 10 years, AOS has underperformed FANG with an annualized return of 7.10%, while FANG has yielded a comparatively higher 12.44% annualized return.
AOS
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- -16.49%
- YTD
- -2.21%
- 6M
- -10.05%
- 1Y
- 1.24%
- 3Y*
- -0.06%
- 5Y*
- 1.05%
- 10Y*
- 7.10%
FANG
- 1D
- -3.63%
- 1M
- 7.15%
- YTD
- 27.56%
- 6M
- 34.51%
- 1Y
- 21.73%
- 3Y*
- 16.36%
- 5Y*
- 23.73%
- 10Y*
- 12.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AOS vs. FANG — Risk / Return Rank
AOS
FANG
AOS vs. FANG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AOS | FANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.05 | 0.56 | -0.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.26 | 0.98 | -0.72 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.13 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.08 | 0.86 | -0.78 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.21 | 2.18 | -1.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AOS | FANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 | 0.56 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 0.62 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 0.25 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.46 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between AOS and FANG is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
AOS vs. FANG - Dividend Comparison
AOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, more than FANG's 2.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOS A. O. Smith Corporation | 2.15% | 2.06% | 1.91% | 1.84% | 1.99% | 1.23% | 1.79% | 1.89% | 1.78% | 0.91% | 1.01% | 0.99% |
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 2.12% | 2.66% | 5.06% | 5.15% | 6.55% | 1.62% | 3.10% | 0.74% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
AOS vs. FANG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOS drawdown since its inception was -66.07%, smaller than the maximum FANG drawdown of -88.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOS and FANG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AOS | FANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.07% | -88.72% | +22.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.86% | -26.16% | +5.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.68% | -42.10% | -0.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.81% | -88.72% | +41.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.83% | -5.72% | -21.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.43% | -19.57% | -0.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.73% | 10.33% | -2.60% |
Volatility
AOS vs. FANG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS) is 7.69%, while Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) has a volatility of 8.16%. This indicates that AOS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FANG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AOS | FANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.69% | 8.16% | -0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.29% | 20.91% | -3.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.90% | 39.22% | -13.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.94% | 38.39% | -11.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.90% | 48.95% | -22.05% |
Financials
AOS vs. FANG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between A. O. Smith Corporation and Diamondback Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities