AOS vs. FANG
Compare and contrast key facts about A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AOS or FANG.
Correlation
The correlation between AOS and FANG is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
AOS vs. FANG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
AOS:
-0.59
FANG:
0.06
AOS:
-0.66
FANG:
0.28
AOS:
0.91
FANG:
1.04
AOS:
-0.56
FANG:
0.07
AOS:
-1.38
FANG:
0.19
AOS:
10.14%
FANG:
9.07%
AOS:
23.83%
FANG:
28.18%
AOS:
-66.52%
FANG:
-88.72%
AOS:
-24.98%
FANG:
-26.20%
Fundamentals
AOS:
$10.27B
FANG:
$46.76B
AOS:
$3.79
FANG:
$17.33
AOS:
18.68
FANG:
9.24
AOS:
2.00
FANG:
1.20
AOS:
$3.89B
FANG:
$9.57B
AOS:
$1.49B
FANG:
$6.02B
AOS:
$818.50M
FANG:
$6.66B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AOS achieves a -15.64% return, which is significantly lower than FANG's 3.09% return. Over the past 10 years, AOS has underperformed FANG with an annualized return of 11.27%, while FANG has yielded a comparatively higher 12.19% annualized return.
AOS
-15.64%
-4.16%
-17.77%
-13.32%
9.69%
11.27%
FANG
3.09%
-15.02%
-19.23%
2.60%
16.74%
12.19%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AOS vs. FANG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AOS vs. FANG - Dividend Comparison
AOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, less than FANG's 5.42% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOS A. O. Smith Corporation | 1.90% | 1.84% | 1.99% | 1.23% | 1.79% | 1.89% | 1.78% | 0.91% | 1.01% | 0.99% | 1.06% | 0.85% |
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 5.42% | 5.15% | 6.55% | 1.62% | 3.10% | 0.74% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
AOS vs. FANG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOS drawdown since its inception was -66.52%, smaller than the maximum FANG drawdown of -88.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOS and FANG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AOS vs. FANG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS) is 6.00%, while Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) has a volatility of 7.42%. This indicates that AOS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FANG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
AOS vs. FANG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between A. O. Smith Corporation and Diamondback Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities