AOS vs. BIPC
Compare and contrast key facts about A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS) and Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AOS or BIPC.
Performance
AOS vs. BIPC - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AOS achieves a -11.98% return, which is significantly lower than BIPC's 25.70% return.
AOS
-11.98%
-8.91%
-16.02%
-4.66%
10.16%
11.88%
BIPC
25.70%
-1.76%
23.55%
41.00%
N/A
N/A
Fundamentals
AOS | BIPC | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | $10.46B | $5.71B |
EPS | $3.79 | -$5.19 |
Total Revenue (TTM) | $3.89B | $3.64B |
Gross Profit (TTM) | $1.49B | $2.29B |
EBITDA (TTM) | $818.50M | $1.41B |
Key characteristics
AOS | BIPC | |
---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio | -0.21 | 1.43 |
Sortino Ratio | -0.13 | 2.00 |
Omega Ratio | 0.98 | 1.24 |
Calmar Ratio | -0.23 | 1.02 |
Martin Ratio | -0.60 | 6.92 |
Ulcer Index | 8.27% | 6.00% |
Daily Std Dev | 23.54% | 29.05% |
Max Drawdown | -66.52% | -48.51% |
Current Drawdown | -21.72% | -10.29% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Correlation
The correlation between AOS and BIPC is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AOS vs. BIPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS) and Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AOS vs. BIPC - Dividend Comparison
AOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, less than BIPC's 3.73% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A. O. Smith Corporation | 1.82% | 1.84% | 1.99% | 1.23% | 1.79% | 1.89% | 1.78% | 0.91% | 1.01% | 0.99% | 1.06% | 0.85% |
Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation | 3.73% | 4.34% | 3.70% | 4.11% | 2.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
AOS vs. BIPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOS drawdown since its inception was -66.52%, which is greater than BIPC's maximum drawdown of -48.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOS and BIPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AOS vs. BIPC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS) is 3.66%, while Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC) has a volatility of 7.62%. This indicates that AOS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
AOS vs. BIPC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between A. O. Smith Corporation and Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities