RL vs. DRS
RL (Ralph Lauren Corporation) and DRS (Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock) are both stocks. RL operates in Apparel Manufacturing (Consumer Cyclical), while DRS operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 3 years, RL returned 52.12%/yr vs 42.32%/yr for DRS. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RL vs. DRS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RL achieves a 14.56% return, which is significantly lower than DRS's 42.93% return.
RL
- 1D
- 2.72%
- 1M
- 21.82%
- YTD
- 14.56%
- 6M
- 9.70%
- 1Y
- 52.96%
- 3Y*
- 52.12%
- 5Y*
- 29.57%
- 10Y*
- 18.35%
DRS
- 1D
- -2.33%
- 1M
- 14.43%
- YTD
- 42.93%
- 6M
- 41.39%
- 1Y
- 8.10%
- 3Y*
- 42.32%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RL vs. DRS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RL Ralph Lauren Corporation | 14.56% | 55.03% | 62.85% | 39.82% | -1.39% |
DRS Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock | 42.93% | 6.56% | 61.23% | 56.81% | 10.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between RL and DRS is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2022 | 0.24 |
Fundamentals
RL:
$15.08
DRS:
$1.44
RL:
26.79
DRS:
33.74
RL:
1.49
DRS:
2.00
RL:
3.11
DRS:
2.65
RL:
$8.11B
DRS:
$3.70B
RL:
$5.67B
DRS:
$894.00M
RL:
$1.18B
DRS:
$433.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RL vs. DRS — Risk / Return Rank
RL
DRS
RL vs. DRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) and Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RL | DRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.07 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 0.25 | +2.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.65 | 0.51 | +9.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RL vs. DRS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RL drawdown since its inception was -68.62%, which is greater than DRS's maximum drawdown of -32.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RL and DRS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RL | DRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.62% | -32.48% | -36.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.67% | -32.48% | +14.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.18% | -32.48% | -3.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.33% | +2.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.11% | -7.25% | -16.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.50% | 16.05% | -10.55% |
Volatility
RL vs. DRS - Volatility Comparison
Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) has a higher volatility of 16.13% compared to Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS) at 13.57%. This indicates that RL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RL | DRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.13% | 13.57% | +2.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.42% | 31.84% | -4.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.57% | 40.60% | -6.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.11% | 38.73% | -1.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.73% | 38.73% | 0.00% |
Dividends
RL vs. DRS - Dividend Comparison
RL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, more than DRS's 0.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRS Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RL Ralph Lauren Corporation | 0.90% | 1.01% | 1.40% | 2.08% | 2.78% | 1.74% | 0.66% | 2.29% | 2.30% | 1.93% | 2.21% | 1.79% |
Financials
RL vs. DRS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ralph Lauren Corporation and Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RL vs. DRS - Profitability Comparison
RL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ralph Lauren Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.38B and revenue of 1.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.7%.
DRS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock reported a gross profit of 212.00M and revenue of 846.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.1%.
RL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ralph Lauren Corporation reported an operating income of 156.80M and revenue of 1.98B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.9%.
DRS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock reported an operating income of 77.00M and revenue of 846.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.1%.
RL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ralph Lauren Corporation reported a net income of 151.60M and revenue of 1.98B, resulting in a net margin of 7.7%.
DRS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock reported a net income of 62.00M and revenue of 846.00M, resulting in a net margin of 7.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RL and DRS have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RL has higher volatility (16.13%) compared to DRS (13.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RL dropped -68.62% vs DRS's -32.48%.
RL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RL and DRS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer