RL vs. RJF
Compare and contrast key facts about Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) and Raymond James Financial, Inc. (RJF).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RL or RJF.
Correlation
The correlation between RL and RJF is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
RL vs. RJF - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
RL:
2.47
RJF:
2.20
RL:
3.59
RJF:
3.05
RL:
1.44
RJF:
1.41
RL:
4.77
RJF:
3.03
RL:
11.17
RJF:
8.33
RL:
7.27%
RJF:
6.49%
RL:
32.94%
RJF:
24.63%
RL:
-68.62%
RJF:
-69.68%
RL:
-0.25%
RJF:
-0.36%
Fundamentals
RL:
$15.38B
RJF:
$34.68B
RL:
$10.50
RJF:
$9.70
RL:
23.59
RJF:
17.46
RL:
2.07
RJF:
2.08
RL:
$4.81B
RJF:
$11.37B
RL:
$3.27B
RJF:
$10.12B
RL:
$699.70M
RJF:
$2.71B
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RL having a 11.18% return and RJF slightly lower at 11.10%. Over the past 10 years, RL has underperformed RJF with an annualized return of 6.58%, while RJF has yielded a comparatively higher 19.03% annualized return.
RL
11.18%
10.59%
47.39%
78.27%
20.17%
6.58%
RJF
11.10%
11.10%
49.32%
53.72%
25.10%
19.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RL vs. RJF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
RL
RJF
RL vs. RJF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) and Raymond James Financial, Inc. (RJF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RL vs. RJF - Dividend Comparison
RL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, more than RJF's 1.08% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RL Ralph Lauren Corporation | 1.26% | 1.40% | 2.08% | 2.78% | 1.74% | 0.66% | 2.29% | 2.30% | 1.93% | 2.21% | 1.79% | 0.97% |
RJF Raymond James Financial, Inc. | 1.08% | 0.87% | 1.53% | 1.67% | 1.04% | 1.16% | 1.93% | 1.48% | 0.74% | 1.18% | 1.28% | 1.15% |
Drawdowns
RL vs. RJF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RL drawdown since its inception was -68.62%, roughly equal to the maximum RJF drawdown of -69.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RL and RJF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RL vs. RJF - Volatility Comparison
Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) has a higher volatility of 8.01% compared to Raymond James Financial, Inc. (RJF) at 6.61%. This indicates that RL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RJF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
RL vs. RJF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ralph Lauren Corporation and Raymond James Financial, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities