RKSG vs. SGRT
RKSG (Ruk Strategic Growth ETF) and SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. RKSG is passively managed, while SGRT is actively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RKSG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SGRT.
Performance
RKSG vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RKSG
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 1.06%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SGRT
- 1D
- -3.34%
- 1M
- -11.51%
- 6M
- 26.99%
- YTD
- 32.43%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RKSG vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RKSG Ruk Strategic Growth ETF | 11.35% |
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth ETF | 19.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between RKSG and SGRT is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2026 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RKSG vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ruk Strategic Growth ETF (RKSG) and SMART Earnings Growth ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RKSG vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RKSG drawdown since its inception was -5.34%, smaller than the maximum SGRT drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RKSG and SGRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RKSG | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.34% | -17.87% | +12.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.17% | -13.82% | +12.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.36% | -3.60% | +2.24% |
Volatility
RKSG vs. SGRT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RKSG | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.83% | 36.83% | -25.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.83% | 36.83% | -25.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.83% | 36.83% | -25.00% |
RKSG vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
RKSG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
RKSG vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison
RKSG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SGRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
RKSG Ruk Strategic Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth ETF | 0.12% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RKSG and SGRT have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RKSG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RKSG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SGRT.
SGRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.12%, compared with 0.00% for RKSG.
Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RKSG and 0.59% for SGRT.
Find the right allocation for RKSG and SGRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer