RISN vs. BLES
RISN (Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF) and BLES (Inspire Global Hope ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RISN is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Inspire, while BLES is a Global Equities fund tracking the Inspire Global Hope Large Cap Equal Weight Index. RISN is actively managed, while BLES is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RISN returned 3.85%/yr vs 8.01%/yr for BLES. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RISN charges 0.82%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for BLES.
Performance
RISN vs. BLES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RISN achieves a 6.63% return, which is significantly lower than BLES's 13.60% return.
RISN
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -1.11%
- 6M
- 3.36%
- YTD
- 6.63%
- 1Y
- 11.95%
- 3Y*
- 9.80%
- 5Y*
- 3.85%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.17%
BLES
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- 6M
- 8.74%
- YTD
- 13.60%
- 1Y
- 22.50%
- 3Y*
- 14.13%
- 5Y*
- 8.01%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.20%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $536.45K | $433.61K | $491.66K | |
| $100.18K | $351.17K | $583.35K |
RISN vs. BLES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RISN Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF | 6.63% | 10.83% | 7.61% | 10.29% | -18.06% | 22.47% | 7.94% |
BLES Inspire Global Hope ETF | 13.60% | 19.25% | 5.59% | 16.47% | -16.21% | 24.36% | 22.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between RISN and BLES is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2020 | 0.73 |
The correlation between RISN and BLES shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.78 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RISN vs. BLES — Risk / Return Rank
RISN
BLES
RISN vs. BLES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF (RISN) and Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RISN | BLES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.31 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 2.66 | -1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.01 | 10.18 | -5.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RISN vs. BLES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RISN drawdown since its inception was -21.88%, smaller than the maximum BLES drawdown of -40.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RISN and BLES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RISN | BLES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.88% | -40.35% | +18.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.42% | -8.29% | +0.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.37% | -15.46% | -0.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.88% | -26.61% | +4.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.38% | -0.63% | -1.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.35% | -5.96% | -1.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.28% | 2.16% | +0.12% |
Volatility
RISN vs. BLES - Volatility Comparison
Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF (RISN) has a higher volatility of 3.67% compared to Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES) at 2.76%. This indicates that RISN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RISN | BLES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.67% | 2.76% | +0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.84% | 10.20% | -0.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.44% | 12.76% | -0.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.30% | 16.40% | -5.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.38% | 18.85% | -7.47% |
RISN vs. BLES - Expense Ratio Comparison
RISN has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than BLES's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
RISN vs. BLES - Dividend Comparison
RISN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than BLES's 1.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLES Inspire Global Hope ETF | 1.80% | 1.97% | 1.90% | 1.80% | 1.64% | 9.28% | 1.61% | 2.16% | 1.73% | 2.01% |
RISN Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF | 1.16% | 0.98% | 1.39% | 2.05% | 1.27% | 9.74% | 4.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RISN and BLES have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RISN has higher volatility (3.67%) compared to BLES (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RISN dropped -21.88% vs BLES's -40.35%.
On 5-year performance, BLES leads with 8.01% vs 3.85% for RISN. On fees, BLES is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, BLES has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BLES has performed better with a 8.01% return vs 3.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BLES is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for RISN.
BLES has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 1.16% for RISN.
RISN is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while BLES is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for RISN and 0.58% for BLES.
BLES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RISN and BLES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer