PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RISN vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RISN vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF (RISN) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RISN achieves a 6.63% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.16% return.


RISN

1D
0.42%
1M
-1.11%
6M
3.36%
YTD
6.63%
1Y
11.95%
3Y*
9.80%
5Y*
3.85%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.17%

VOO

1D
0.71%
1M
0.26%
6M
8.58%
YTD
10.16%
1Y
21.58%
3Y*
19.42%
5Y*
12.83%
10Y*
15.14%
ALL TIME*
14.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$100.18K$351.17K$583.35K
$3.82B$3.78B$5.44B

RISN vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
RISN
Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF
6.63%10.83%7.61%10.29%-18.06%22.47%7.94%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.16%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%17.23%

Correlation

The correlation between RISN and VOO is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2020

0.70

The correlation between RISN and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.72 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RISN vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RISN
RISN Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
RISN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RISN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
RISN Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
RISN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
RISN Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RISN vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF (RISN) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RISNVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.28

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

2.21

-0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.01

9.44

-4.43

RISN vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RISN Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RISN and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RISN vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RISN drawdown since its inception was -21.88%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RISN and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RISNVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.88%

-33.99%

+12.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.42%

-8.90%

+1.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.37%

-18.69%

+2.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.88%

-24.52%

+2.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.38%

-1.38%

-1.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.35%

-3.67%

-3.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.28%

2.08%

+0.20%

Volatility

RISN vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF (RISN) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) have volatilities of 3.67% and 3.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RISNVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

3.54%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.84%

10.10%

-0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.44%

12.82%

-0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.30%

16.93%

-5.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.38%

18.01%

-6.63%

RISN vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RISN has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

RISN vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

RISN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, more than VOO's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RISN
Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF
1.16%0.98%1.39%2.05%1.27%9.74%4.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.07%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


RISN and VOO have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RISN has higher volatility (3.67%) compared to VOO (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RISN dropped -21.88% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 5-year performance, VOO leads with 12.83% vs 3.85% for RISN. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VOO has performed better with a 12.83% return vs 3.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for RISN.

RISN has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 1.07% for VOO.

RISN is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Inspire and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for RISN and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RISN and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer