RING vs. GVAL

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

RING (iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF) and GVAL (Cambria Global Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RING is a Gold fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Gold Miners Investable Market Index, while GVAL is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Cambria. RING is passively managed, while GVAL is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, RING returned 13.85%/yr vs 11.46%/yr for GVAL. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RING charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for GVAL.

Performance

RING vs. GVAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) and Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RING achieves a -5.54% return, which is significantly lower than GVAL's 16.63% return. Over the past 10 years, RING has outperformed GVAL with an annualized return of 13.85%, while GVAL has yielded a comparatively lower 11.46% annualized return.

RING

• 1D: 3.20%
• 1M: -14.81%
• YTD: -5.54%
• 6M: -4.18%
• 1Y: 54.08%
• 3Y*: 44.87%
• 5Y*: 18.76%
• 10Y*: 13.85%

GVAL

• 1D: 1.47%
• 1M: 3.88%
• YTD: 16.63%
• 6M: 18.08%
• 1Y: 40.92%
• 3Y*: 26.84%
• 5Y*: 13.64%
• 10Y*: 11.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RING vs. GVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF	-5.54%	164.72%	15.98%	12.29%	-15.40%	-7.46%	24.98%	49.92%	-13.14%	10.24%
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF	16.63%	55.87%	2.59%	13.30%	-7.98%	10.70%	-8.51%	17.24%	-14.30%	29.50%

Correlation

The correlation between RING and GVAL is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.48
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2014	0.31

Over the past year, RING and GVAL have become more correlated (0.58) than their long-term average of 0.31, meaning their price movements have been converging.

RING vs. GVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RING	GVAL
Basic Materials	100.0%	8.3%
Communication Services	-	4.6%
Consumer Cyclical	-	2.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	1.9%
Energy	-	7.7%
Financial Services	-	16.5%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	3.6%
Real Estate	-	6.9%
Technology	-	6.5%
Utilities	-	4.0%

Return for Risk

RING vs. GVAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RING

RING Risk / Return Rank: 36
RING Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
RING Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
RING Omega Ratio Rank: 39
RING Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
RING Martin Ratio Rank: 33

GVAL

GVAL Risk / Return Rank: 84
GVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
GVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
GVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 87
GVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
GVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RING vs. GVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) and Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RING	GVAL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.20	2.64	-1.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.62	3.50	-1.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.47	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.59	3.48	-1.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.45	13.27	-8.81

RING vs. GVAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RING Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the GVAL Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RING and GVAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RING vs. GVAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RING drawdown since its inception was -79.47%, which is greater than GVAL's maximum drawdown of -46.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RING and GVAL.

Drawdown Indicators

	RING	GVAL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.47%	-46.82%	-32.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.72%	-11.50%	-24.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.72%	-15.72%	-20.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.94%	-30.83%	-17.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.04%	-46.82%	-5.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-30.03%	0.00%	-30.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-47.36%	-13.85%	-33.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.74%	3.02%	+9.72%

Volatility

RING vs. GVAL - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) has a higher volatility of 16.83% compared to Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) at 6.00%. This indicates that RING's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GVAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RING	GVAL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.83%	6.00%	+10.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.11%	13.40%	+25.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.31%	15.18%	+32.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.81%	18.56%	+18.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.70%	19.20%	+17.50%

RING vs. GVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

RING has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than GVAL's 0.64% expense ratio.

Dividends

RING vs. GVAL - Dividend Comparison

RING's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than GVAL's 2.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF	2.77%	2.93%	4.75%	6.12%	5.05%	2.97%	1.90%	2.84%	4.65%	2.00%	2.54%	2.11%
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF	0.89%	0.84%	1.43%	2.01%	2.29%	2.38%	0.83%	0.83%	0.70%	0.42%	1.41%	0.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RING and GVAL in my portfolio?

RING and GVAL have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RING or GVAL?

RING has higher volatility (16.83%) compared to GVAL (6.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RING dropped -79.47% vs GVAL's -46.82%.

Which ETF is better, RING or GVAL?

On 10-year performance, RING leads with 13.85% vs 11.46% for GVAL. On fees, RING is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, GVAL has been the lower-risk option at 6.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RING or GVAL?

Over the 10-year period, RING has performed better with a 13.85% return vs 11.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RING or GVAL?

RING is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for GVAL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RING or GVAL?

GVAL has the higher dividend yield at 2.77%, compared with 0.89% for RING.

What is the main difference between RING and GVAL?

RING is categorized as Gold, while GVAL is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RING and 0.64% for GVAL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.