PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GVAL vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GVAL vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GVAL achieves a 19.68% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 9.75% return. Over the past 10 years, GVAL has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 12.03%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.77% annualized return.


GVAL

1D
0.49%
1M
6.30%
YTD
19.68%
6M
19.91%
1Y
46.46%
3Y*
28.26%
5Y*
14.84%
10Y*
12.03%

VOO

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.08%
YTD
9.75%
6M
9.30%
1Y
26.77%
3Y*
21.36%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
15.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GVAL vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GVAL
Cambria Global Value ETF
19.68%55.87%2.59%13.30%-7.98%10.70%-8.51%17.24%-14.30%29.50%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
9.75%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between GVAL and VOO is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2014

0.63

The correlation between GVAL and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (3 years) to 0.68 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GVAL vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GVAL
VOO

Financial Services

16.9%
10.9%

Technology

9.4%
39.1%

Basic Materials

7.7%
1.7%

Energy

6.8%
3.2%

Real Estate

6.2%
1.8%

Communication Services

4.3%
10.5%

Utilities

3.7%
2.5%

Industrials

3.6%
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

2.7%
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

1.8%
4.5%

Healthcare

-

8.3%

Financial Services

GVAL
16.9%
VOO
10.9%

Technology

GVAL
9.4%
VOO
39.1%

Basic Materials

GVAL
7.7%
VOO
1.7%

Energy

GVAL
6.8%
VOO
3.2%

Real Estate

GVAL
6.2%
VOO
1.8%

Communication Services

GVAL
4.3%
VOO
10.5%

Utilities

GVAL
3.7%
VOO
2.5%

Industrials

GVAL
3.6%
VOO
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

GVAL
2.7%
VOO
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

GVAL
1.8%
VOO
4.5%

Healthcare

GVAL

-

VOO
8.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GVAL vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GVAL
GVAL Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
GVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
GVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
GVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
GVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GVAL vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GVALVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.39

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.06

3.02

+1.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.49

13.58

+1.90

GVAL vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GVAL Sharpe Ratio is 3.03, which is higher than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GVAL and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GVAL vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GVAL drawdown since its inception was -46.82%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVAL and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GVALVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.82%

-33.99%

-12.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.50%

-8.90%

-2.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.72%

-18.69%

+2.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.83%

-24.52%

-6.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.82%

-33.99%

-12.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

-1.74%

+1.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.83%

-3.68%

-10.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

1.98%

+1.03%

Volatility

GVAL vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) has a higher volatility of 6.03% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.60%. This indicates that GVAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GVALVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.03%

4.60%

+1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.65%

9.73%

+3.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.45%

12.39%

+3.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.58%

16.90%

+1.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.19%

18.05%

+1.14%

GVAL vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GVAL has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

GVAL vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

GVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, more than VOO's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GVAL
Cambria Global Value ETF
2.39%2.93%4.75%6.12%5.05%2.97%1.90%2.84%4.65%2.00%2.54%2.11%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.04%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


GVAL and VOO have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GVAL has higher volatility (6.03%) compared to VOO (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GVAL dropped -46.82% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.77% vs 12.03% for GVAL. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.77% return vs 12.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for GVAL.

GVAL has the higher dividend yield at 2.39%, compared with 1.04% for VOO.

GVAL is categorized as Global Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Cambria and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for GVAL and 0.03% for VOO.

GVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GVAL and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer