GVAL vs. VOO
GVAL (Cambria Global Value ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GVAL is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Cambria, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. GVAL is actively managed, while VOO is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GVAL returned 12.03%/yr vs 15.77%/yr for VOO. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GVAL charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
GVAL vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GVAL achieves a 19.68% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 9.75% return. Over the past 10 years, GVAL has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 12.03%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.77% annualized return.
GVAL
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 6.30%
- YTD
- 19.68%
- 6M
- 19.91%
- 1Y
- 46.46%
- 3Y*
- 28.26%
- 5Y*
- 14.84%
- 10Y*
- 12.03%
VOO
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 9.75%
- 6M
- 9.30%
- 1Y
- 26.77%
- 3Y*
- 21.36%
- 5Y*
- 13.58%
- 10Y*
- 15.77%
GVAL vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF | 19.68% | 55.87% | 2.59% | 13.30% | -7.98% | 10.70% | -8.51% | 17.24% | -14.30% | 29.50% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 9.75% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between GVAL and VOO is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2014 | 0.63 |
The correlation between GVAL and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (3 years) to 0.68 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GVAL vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GVAL
VOO
Financial Services
Technology
Basic Materials
Energy
Real Estate
Communication Services
Utilities
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
GVAL
VOO
Technology
GVAL
VOO
Basic Materials
GVAL
VOO
Energy
GVAL
VOO
Real Estate
GVAL
VOO
Communication Services
GVAL
VOO
Utilities
GVAL
VOO
Industrials
GVAL
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
GVAL
VOO
Consumer Defensive
GVAL
VOO
Healthcare
GVAL
-
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GVAL vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
GVAL
VOO
GVAL vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GVAL | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.39 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.06 | 3.02 | +1.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.49 | 13.58 | +1.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GVAL vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GVAL drawdown since its inception was -46.82%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVAL and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GVAL | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.82% | -33.99% | -12.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.50% | -8.90% | -2.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.72% | -18.69% | +2.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.83% | -24.52% | -6.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.82% | -33.99% | -12.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.41% | -1.74% | +1.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.83% | -3.68% | -10.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | 1.98% | +1.03% |
Volatility
GVAL vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) has a higher volatility of 6.03% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.60%. This indicates that GVAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GVAL | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.03% | 4.60% | +1.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.65% | 9.73% | +3.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.45% | 12.39% | +3.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.58% | 16.90% | +1.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.19% | 18.05% | +1.14% |
GVAL vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GVAL has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
GVAL vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
GVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, more than VOO's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF | 2.39% | 2.93% | 4.75% | 6.12% | 5.05% | 2.97% | 1.90% | 2.84% | 4.65% | 2.00% | 2.54% | 2.11% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.04% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GVAL and VOO have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GVAL has higher volatility (6.03%) compared to VOO (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GVAL dropped -46.82% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.77% vs 12.03% for GVAL. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.77% return vs 12.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for GVAL.
GVAL has the higher dividend yield at 2.39%, compared with 1.04% for VOO.
GVAL is categorized as Global Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Cambria and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for GVAL and 0.03% for VOO.
GVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GVAL and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer