GVAL vs. AUSF

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

GVAL (Cambria Global Value ETF) and AUSF (Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GVAL is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Cambria, while AUSF is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index. GVAL is actively managed, while AUSF is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GVAL returned 15.04%/yr vs 14.47%/yr for AUSF. Their 0.56 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GVAL charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for AUSF.

Performance

GVAL vs. AUSF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) and Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GVAL achieves a 20.23% return, which is significantly higher than AUSF's 12.60% return.

GVAL

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: 3.63%
• 6M: 8.76%
• YTD: 20.23%
• 1Y: 40.21%
• 3Y*: 25.70%
• 5Y*: 15.04%
• 10Y*: 11.12%
• ALL TIME*: 6.96%

AUSF

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 3.29%
• 6M: 7.58%
• YTD: 12.60%
• 1Y: 20.12%
• 3Y*: 19.13%
• 5Y*: 14.47%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF	$2.36M	$2.26M	$3.95M
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF	$3.54M	$5.56M	$6.93M

GVAL vs. AUSF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF	20.23%	55.87%	2.59%	13.30%	-7.98%	10.70%	-8.51%	17.24%	-8.84%
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF	12.60%	13.69%	16.05%	22.26%	-0.18%	27.48%	1.27%	24.06%	-11.18%

Correlation

The correlation between GVAL and AUSF is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.24
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.42
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2018	0.56

Over the past year, the correlation between GVAL and AUSF has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

GVAL vs. AUSF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GVAL	AUSF
Financial Services	18.2%	20.1%
Basic Materials	8.4%	2.5%
Energy	7.9%	3.3%
Technology	6.8%	15.7%
Real Estate	6.7%	4.3%
Utilities	5.2%	4.5%
Industrials	4.8%	13.4%
Communication Services	4.3%	6.6%
Consumer Cyclical	3.1%	8.8%
Consumer Defensive	1.9%	7.9%
Healthcare	-	12.3%

Return for Risk

GVAL vs. AUSF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GVAL

GVAL Risk / Return Rank: 91
GVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
GVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
GVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 91
GVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
GVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 88

AUSF

AUSF Risk / Return Rank: 80
AUSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
AUSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
AUSF Omega Ratio Rank: 77
AUSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
AUSF Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GVAL vs. AUSF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) and Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GVAL	AUSF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.53	1.83	+0.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.40	2.68	+0.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.32	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.51	3.27	+0.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.97	9.56	+3.40

GVAL vs. AUSF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GVAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is higher than the AUSF Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GVAL and AUSF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GVAL vs. AUSF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GVAL drawdown since its inception was -46.82%, which is greater than AUSF's maximum drawdown of -44.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVAL and AUSF.

Drawdown Indicators

	GVAL	AUSF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.82%	-44.25%	-2.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.50%	-5.84%	-5.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.72%	-12.29%	-3.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.83%	-14.23%	-16.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.62%	+1.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.72%	-4.16%	-9.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.11%	1.99%	+1.12%

Volatility

GVAL vs. AUSF - Volatility Comparison

Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) has a higher volatility of 4.84% compared to Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) at 3.73%. This indicates that GVAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUSF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GVAL	AUSF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.84%	3.73%	+1.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.24%	7.46%	+6.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.96%	10.46%	+5.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.62%	13.62%	+5.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.00%	18.96%	+0.04%

GVAL vs. AUSF - Expense Ratio Comparison

GVAL has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than AUSF's 0.27% expense ratio.

Dividends

GVAL vs. AUSF - Dividend Comparison

GVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, less than AUSF's 2.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF	2.61%	2.78%	2.63%	1.83%	2.51%	2.22%	2.95%	4.02%	1.46%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF	2.38%	2.93%	4.75%	6.12%	5.05%	2.97%	1.90%	2.84%	4.65%	2.00%	2.54%	2.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GVAL and AUSF in my portfolio?

GVAL and AUSF have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GVAL or AUSF?

GVAL has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to AUSF (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GVAL dropped -46.82% vs AUSF's -44.25%.

Which ETF is better, GVAL or AUSF?

On 5-year performance, GVAL leads with 15.04% vs 14.47% for AUSF. On fees, AUSF is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, AUSF has been the lower-risk option at 3.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GVAL or AUSF?

Over the 5-year period, GVAL has performed better with a 15.04% return vs 14.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GVAL or AUSF?

AUSF is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for GVAL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GVAL or AUSF?

AUSF has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 2.38% for GVAL.

What is the main difference between GVAL and AUSF?

GVAL is categorized as Global Equities, while AUSF is Mid Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Cambria and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for GVAL and 0.27% for AUSF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.