RIDH.TO vs. RGPM.NEO

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

RIDH.TO (RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders (CAD Hedged) ETF) and RGPM.NEO (RBC Global Precious Metals Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - RIDH.TO is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by RBC, while RGPM.NEO is a Precious Metals fund actively managed by RBC. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, RIDH.TO returned 21.98%/yr vs 40.42%/yr for RGPM.NEO. Their 0.12 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RIDH.TO charges 0.54%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for RGPM.NEO.

Performance

RIDH.TO vs. RGPM.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders (CAD Hedged) ETF (RIDH.TO) and RBC Global Precious Metals Fund (RGPM.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIDH.TO achieves a 16.37% return, which is significantly higher than RGPM.NEO's -8.72% return.

RIDH.TO

• 1D: -1.23%
• 1M: 1.94%
• 6M: 10.08%
• YTD: 16.37%
• 1Y: 36.80%
• 3Y*: 21.98%
• 5Y*: 15.14%
• 10Y*: 11.11%
• ALL TIME*: 10.01%

RGPM.NEO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -6.73%
• 6M: -14.75%
• YTD: -8.72%
• 1Y: 46.97%
• 3Y*: 40.42%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 36.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RGPM.NEO RBC Global Precious Metals Fund	CA$90.23K	CA$221.18K	CA$277.75K
RIDH.TO RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders (CAD Hedged) ETF	CA$18.38K	CA$62.92K	CA$73.93K

RIDH.TO vs. RGPM.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
RIDH.TO RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders (CAD Hedged) ETF	16.37%	32.49%	12.69%	11.71%
RGPM.NEO RBC Global Precious Metals Fund	-8.72%	143.89%	36.75%	-3.95%

Correlation

The correlation between RIDH.TO and RGPM.NEO is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.35
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2023	0.12

Over the past year, RIDH.TO and RGPM.NEO have become more correlated (0.35) than their long-term average of 0.12, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

RIDH.TO vs. RGPM.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RIDH.TO

RIDH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 93
RIDH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
RIDH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
RIDH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 94
RIDH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
RIDH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 93

RGPM.NEO

RGPM.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 38
RGPM.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
RGPM.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
RGPM.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 43
RGPM.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
RGPM.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RIDH.TO vs. RGPM.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders (CAD Hedged) ETF (RIDH.TO) and RBC Global Precious Metals Fund (RGPM.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RIDH.TO	RGPM.NEO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.86	1.05	+1.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.85	1.48	+2.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.21	+0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.95	1.33	+2.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.82	2.97	+14.85

RIDH.TO vs. RGPM.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIDH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.86, which is higher than the RGPM.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIDH.TO and RGPM.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RIDH.TO vs. RGPM.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIDH.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.53%, smaller than the maximum RGPM.NEO drawdown of -36.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIDH.TO and RGPM.NEO.

Drawdown Indicators

	RIDH.TO	RGPM.NEO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.53%	-36.67%	+2.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.67%	-36.67%	+28.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.33%	-36.67%	+22.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.01%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.53%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.23%	-31.42%	+30.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.38%	-9.44%	+5.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.93%	16.37%	-14.44%

Volatility

RIDH.TO vs. RGPM.NEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders (CAD Hedged) ETF (RIDH.TO) is 3.24%, while RBC Global Precious Metals Fund (RGPM.NEO) has a volatility of 10.97%. This indicates that RIDH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RGPM.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RIDH.TO	RGPM.NEO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.24%	10.97%	-7.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.85%	35.42%	-25.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.96%	46.62%	-34.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.66%	33.78%	-20.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.74%	33.78%	-18.04%

RIDH.TO vs. RGPM.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RIDH.TO has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than RGPM.NEO's 1.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

RIDH.TO vs. RGPM.NEO - Dividend Comparison

RIDH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, while RGPM.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RGPM.NEO RBC Global Precious Metals Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RIDH.TO RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders (CAD Hedged) ETF	3.06%	3.10%	3.69%	3.70%	4.41%	2.63%	3.63%	4.07%	4.55%	2.91%	3.33%	3.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RIDH.TO and RGPM.NEO in my portfolio?

RIDH.TO and RGPM.NEO have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RIDH.TO or RGPM.NEO?

On fees, RIDH.TO is cheaper at 0.54% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RIDH.TO or RGPM.NEO?

RIDH.TO is cheaper with a 0.54% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for RGPM.NEO.

What is the main difference between RIDH.TO and RGPM.NEO?

RIDH.TO is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while RGPM.NEO is Precious Metals. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for RIDH.TO and 1.02% for RGPM.NEO.