RGPM.NEO vs. SPLT.L
Compare and contrast key facts about RBC Global Precious Metals Fund (RGPM.NEO) and iShares Physical Platinum ETC (SPLT.L).
RGPM.NEO and SPLT.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RGPM.NEO is an actively managed fund by RBC Global Asset Management.. It was launched on Mar 8, 2023. SPLT.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Platinum. It was launched on Apr 8, 2011.
Performance
RGPM.NEO vs. SPLT.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RGPM.NEO vs. SPLT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RGPM.NEO RBC Global Precious Metals Fund | 8.72% | 143.89% | 36.75% | -3.95% |
SPLT.L iShares Physical Platinum ETC | -3.12% | 120.07% | -9.90% | 2.24% |
Different Trading Currencies
RGPM.NEO is traded in USD, while SPLT.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SPLT.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGPM.NEO achieves a 8.72% return, which is significantly higher than SPLT.L's -3.12% return.
RGPM.NEO
- 1D
- 7.19%
- 1M
- -17.81%
- YTD
- 8.72%
- 6M
- 25.27%
- 1Y
- 94.42%
- 3Y*
- 46.67%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPLT.L
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- -17.73%
- YTD
- -3.12%
- 6M
- 23.21%
- 1Y
- 93.29%
- 3Y*
- 24.69%
- 5Y*
- 9.61%
- 10Y*
- 6.98%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RGPM.NEO vs. SPLT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
RGPM.NEO has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than SPLT.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RGPM.NEO vs. SPLT.L — Risk / Return Rank
RGPM.NEO
SPLT.L
RGPM.NEO vs. SPLT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Global Precious Metals Fund (RGPM.NEO) and iShares Physical Platinum ETC (SPLT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RGPM.NEO | SPLT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.23 | 1.97 | +0.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.44 | 2.26 | +0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.34 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.29 | 2.66 | +0.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.36 | 7.91 | +4.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RGPM.NEO | SPLT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23 | 1.97 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.58 | 0.01 | +1.57 |
Correlation
The correlation between RGPM.NEO and SPLT.L is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RGPM.NEO vs. SPLT.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither RGPM.NEO nor SPLT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
RGPM.NEO vs. SPLT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGPM.NEO drawdown since its inception was -29.46%, smaller than the maximum SPLT.L drawdown of -70.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGPM.NEO and SPLT.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGPM.NEO | SPLT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.46% | -58.05% | +28.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.46% | -33.87% | +4.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.31% | -29.72% | +11.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.82% | -34.26% | +26.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.84% | 11.37% | -3.53% |
Volatility
RGPM.NEO vs. SPLT.L - Volatility Comparison
RBC Global Precious Metals Fund (RGPM.NEO) and iShares Physical Platinum ETC (SPLT.L) have volatilities of 17.04% and 16.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RGPM.NEO | SPLT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.04% | 16.33% | +0.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.23% | 42.41% | -6.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.57% | 47.11% | -4.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.81% | 32.03% | -0.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.81% | 29.05% | +2.76% |