PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
RGPM.NEO vs. XGD.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

RGPM.NEO vs. XGD.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about RBC Global Precious Metals Fund (RGPM.NEO) and iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF (XGD.TO).

RGPM.NEO and XGD.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RGPM.NEO is an actively managed fund by RBC Global Asset Management.. It was launched on Mar 8, 2023. XGD.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Gbl Gold GR CAD. It was launched on Mar 23, 2001.

Performance

RGPM.NEO vs. XGD.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RBC Global Precious Metals Fund (RGPM.NEO) and iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF (XGD.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RGPM.NEO vs. XGD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023
RGPM.NEO
RBC Global Precious Metals Fund		8.72%143.89%36.75%-3.95%
XGD.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF		9.57%156.16%10.18%7.80%
Different Trading Currencies

RGPM.NEO is traded in USD, while XGD.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the XGD.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGPM.NEO achieves a 8.72% return, which is significantly higher than XGD.TO's 2.67% return.

RGPM.NEO

1D
7.19%
1M
-17.81%
YTD
8.72%
6M
25.27%
1Y
94.42%
3Y*
46.67%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

XGD.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
-24.44%
YTD
2.67%
6M
16.26%
1Y
92.85%
3Y*
40.31%
5Y*
22.52%
10Y*
16.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

RBC Global Precious Metals Fund

iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF

Often compared with RGPM.NEO:
RGPM.NEO vs. ZGD.TORGPM.NEO vs. SPLT.LRGPM.NEO vs. AUMIRGPM.NEO vs. SPYRGPM.NEO vs. AEMRGPM.NEO vs. XBM.TORGPM.NEO vs. REGB.L
Often compared with XGD.TO:
XGD.TO vs. CGL.TOXGD.TO vs. GLDXGD.TO vs. ZGD.TOXGD.TO vs. MNT.TOXGD.TO vs. ZGLD.SWXGD.TO vs. BRK-BXGD.TO vs. XEI.TO

RGPM.NEO vs. XGD.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGPM.NEO has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than XGD.TO's 0.61% expense ratio.

RGPM.NEO
RBC Global Precious Metals Fund
XGD.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF

Return for Risk

RGPM.NEO vs. XGD.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
RGPM.NEO
RGPM.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
RGPM.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGPM.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGPM.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
RGPM.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGPM.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
XGD.TO
XGD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
XGD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
XGD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGPM.NEO vs. XGD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Global Precious Metals Fund (RGPM.NEO) and iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF (XGD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

RGPM.NEOXGD.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.23

2.10

+0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.44

2.36

+0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.35

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

3.22

+0.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.36

11.63

+0.74

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RGPM.NEO vs. XGD.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGPM.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the XGD.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGPM.NEO and XGD.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

RGPM.NEOXGD.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.23

2.10

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.66

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.47

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.58

0.17

+1.41

Correlation

The correlation between RGPM.NEO and XGD.TO is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

RGPM.NEO vs. XGD.TO - Dividend Comparison

RGPM.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XGD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RGPM.NEO
RBC Global Precious Metals Fund		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XGD.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF		0.56%0.62%0.93%1.49%1.80%1.38%0.35%0.54%0.25%0.14%0.09%0.57%

Drawdowns

RGPM.NEO vs. XGD.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGPM.NEO drawdown since its inception was -29.46%, smaller than the maximum XGD.TO drawdown of -80.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGPM.NEO and XGD.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

RGPM.NEOXGD.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.46%

-72.55%

+43.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.46%

-28.95%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-40.82%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-46.96%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.31%

-17.83%

-0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.82%

-28.37%

+20.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.84%

7.93%

-0.09%

Volatility

RGPM.NEO vs. XGD.TO - Volatility Comparison

RBC Global Precious Metals Fund (RGPM.NEO) has a higher volatility of 17.04% compared to iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF (XGD.TO) at 15.49%. This indicates that RGPM.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XGD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

RGPM.NEOXGD.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.04%

15.49%

+1.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.23%

36.07%

+0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.57%

44.47%

-1.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.81%

34.30%

-2.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.81%

35.45%

-3.64%