PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RGPM.NEO vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RGPM.NEO vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RBC Global Precious Metals Fund (RGPM.NEO) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RGPM.NEO vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
RGPM.NEO
RBC Global Precious Metals Fund
8.72%143.89%36.75%-3.95%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
-4.37%17.72%24.89%19.38%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGPM.NEO achieves a 8.72% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's -4.37% return.


RGPM.NEO

1D
7.19%
1M
-17.81%
YTD
8.72%
6M
25.27%
1Y
94.42%
3Y*
46.67%
5Y*
10Y*

SPY

1D
2.91%
1M
-4.94%
YTD
-4.37%
6M
-1.82%
1Y
17.59%
3Y*
18.19%
5Y*
11.69%
10Y*
13.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RGPM.NEO vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGPM.NEO has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RGPM.NEO vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGPM.NEO
RGPM.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
RGPM.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGPM.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGPM.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
RGPM.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGPM.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGPM.NEO vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Global Precious Metals Fund (RGPM.NEO) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RGPM.NEOSPYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.23

0.93

+1.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.44

1.45

+0.99

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.22

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

1.53

+1.77

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.36

7.30

+5.07

RGPM.NEO vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGPM.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is higher than the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGPM.NEO and SPY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RGPM.NEOSPYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.23

0.93

+1.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.58

0.56

+1.02

Correlation

The correlation between RGPM.NEO and SPY is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

RGPM.NEO vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

RGPM.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RGPM.NEO
RBC Global Precious Metals Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
1.14%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Drawdowns

RGPM.NEO vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGPM.NEO drawdown since its inception was -29.46%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGPM.NEO and SPY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RGPM.NEOSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.46%

-55.19%

+25.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.46%

-12.05%

-17.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.31%

-6.24%

-12.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.82%

-9.09%

+1.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.84%

2.52%

+5.32%

Volatility

RGPM.NEO vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

RBC Global Precious Metals Fund (RGPM.NEO) has a higher volatility of 17.04% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 5.31%. This indicates that RGPM.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RGPM.NEOSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.04%

5.31%

+11.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.23%

9.47%

+26.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.57%

19.05%

+23.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.81%

17.06%

+14.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.81%

17.92%

+13.89%