RGPM.NEO vs. AUMI

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about RBC Global Precious Metals Fund (RGPM.NEO) and Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI).

RGPM.NEO and AUMI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RGPM.NEO is an actively managed fund by RBC Global Asset Management.. It was launched on Mar 8, 2023. AUMI is a passively managed fund by Themes that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners Index. It was launched on Dec 12, 2023.

Performance

RGPM.NEO vs. AUMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RBC Global Precious Metals Fund (RGPM.NEO) and Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RGPM.NEO vs. AUMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
RGPM.NEO RBC Global Precious Metals Fund	8.72%	143.89%	36.75%	0.00%
AUMI Themes Gold Miners ETF	5.10%	164.18%	30.61%	4.25%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGPM.NEO achieves a 8.72% return, which is significantly higher than AUMI's 5.10% return.

RGPM.NEO

• 1D: 7.19%
• 1M: -17.81%
• YTD: 8.72%
• 6M: 25.27%
• 1Y: 94.42%
• 3Y*: 46.67%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AUMI

• 1D: 7.44%
• 1M: -20.93%
• YTD: 5.10%
• 6M: 21.83%
• 1Y: 106.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGPM.NEO vs. AUMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGPM.NEO has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than AUMI's 0.35% expense ratio.

RGPM.NEO

RBC Global Precious Metals Fund

AUMI

Themes Gold Miners ETF

Return for Risk

RGPM.NEO vs. AUMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGPM.NEO

RGPM.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 91
RGPM.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
RGPM.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
RGPM.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 91
RGPM.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
RGPM.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 91

AUMI

AUMI Risk / Return Rank: 91
AUMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
AUMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
AUMI Omega Ratio Rank: 87
AUMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
AUMI Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGPM.NEO vs. AUMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Global Precious Metals Fund (RGPM.NEO) and Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RGPM.NEO	AUMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.23	2.16	+0.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.44	2.43	+0.01
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.34	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.29	3.34	-0.05
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.36	11.89	+0.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RGPM.NEO vs. AUMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGPM.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the AUMI Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGPM.NEO and AUMI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RGPM.NEO	AUMI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.23	2.16	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.58	1.92	-0.34

Correlation

The correlation between RGPM.NEO and AUMI is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

RGPM.NEO vs. AUMI - Dividend Comparison

RGPM.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AUMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%.

	TTM	2025	2024
RGPM.NEO RBC Global Precious Metals Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
AUMI Themes Gold Miners ETF	0.82%	0.86%	1.84%

Drawdowns

RGPM.NEO vs. AUMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGPM.NEO drawdown since its inception was -29.46%, smaller than the maximum AUMI drawdown of -31.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGPM.NEO and AUMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	RGPM.NEO	AUMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.46%	-31.88%	+2.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.46%	-31.88%	+2.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.31%	-20.93%	+2.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.82%	-5.98%	-1.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.84%	8.97%	-1.13%

Volatility

RGPM.NEO vs. AUMI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RBC Global Precious Metals Fund (RGPM.NEO) is 17.04%, while Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI) has a volatility of 19.60%. This indicates that RGPM.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AUMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RGPM.NEO	AUMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.04%	19.60%	-2.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.23%	40.36%	-4.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.57%	49.41%	-6.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.81%	41.29%	-9.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.81%	41.29%	-9.48%