RIDH.TO vs. FCIL.NEO
Compare and contrast key facts about RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders (CAD Hedged) ETF (RIDH.TO) and Fidelity International Low Volatility ETF (FCIL.NEO).
RIDH.TO and FCIL.NEO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RIDH.TO is an actively managed fund by RBC. It was launched on Oct 22, 2014. FCIL.NEO is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity Canada International Low Volatility Index. It was launched on Jan 18, 2019.
Performance
RIDH.TO vs. FCIL.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RIDH.TO vs. FCIL.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIDH.TO RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders (CAD Hedged) ETF | 7.03% | 31.43% | 17.07% | 25.01% | -2.03% | 24.91% | -3.01% | 18.27% |
FCIL.NEO Fidelity International Low Volatility ETF | 5.42% | 19.10% | 7.89% | 11.49% | -6.83% | 7.63% | -0.78% | 11.33% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RIDH.TO achieves a 7.03% return, which is significantly higher than FCIL.NEO's 5.42% return.
RIDH.TO
- 1D
- 2.37%
- 1M
- -3.86%
- YTD
- 7.03%
- 6M
- 16.45%
- 1Y
- 30.99%
- 3Y*
- 24.06%
- 5Y*
- 17.70%
- 10Y*
- 14.51%
FCIL.NEO
- 1D
- 2.54%
- 1M
- -5.04%
- YTD
- 5.42%
- 6M
- 9.41%
- 1Y
- 15.60%
- 3Y*
- 12.62%
- 5Y*
- 9.03%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RIDH.TO vs. FCIL.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
RIDH.TO has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than FCIL.NEO's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RIDH.TO vs. FCIL.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
RIDH.TO
FCIL.NEO
RIDH.TO vs. FCIL.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders (CAD Hedged) ETF (RIDH.TO) and Fidelity International Low Volatility ETF (FCIL.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RIDH.TO | FCIL.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.91 | 0.98 | +0.93 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.66 | 1.46 | +1.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.21 | +0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.56 | 1.67 | +0.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.94 | 4.57 | +7.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RIDH.TO | FCIL.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91 | 0.98 | +0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.32 | 0.71 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.55 | +0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between RIDH.TO and FCIL.NEO is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RIDH.TO vs. FCIL.NEO - Dividend Comparison
RIDH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, while FCIL.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIDH.TO RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders (CAD Hedged) ETF | 3.05% | 3.12% | 7.51% | 9.53% | 6.85% | 7.07% | 4.73% | 9.16% | 8.80% | 5.59% | 10.87% | 17.06% |
FCIL.NEO Fidelity International Low Volatility ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.94% | 2.44% | 2.53% | 3.78% | 2.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RIDH.TO vs. FCIL.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RIDH.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.34%, which is greater than FCIL.NEO's maximum drawdown of -20.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIDH.TO and FCIL.NEO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RIDH.TO | FCIL.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.34% | -20.28% | -14.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.40% | -9.17% | -2.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.33% | -20.28% | +5.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.03% | -5.04% | +1.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.16% | -4.53% | +1.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.54% | 3.36% | -0.82% |
Volatility
RIDH.TO vs. FCIL.NEO - Volatility Comparison
RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders (CAD Hedged) ETF (RIDH.TO) and Fidelity International Low Volatility ETF (FCIL.NEO) have volatilities of 6.28% and 6.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RIDH.TO | FCIL.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.28% | 6.33% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.86% | 9.52% | -0.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.28% | 15.99% | +0.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.44% | 12.79% | +0.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.87% | 13.65% | +2.22% |