RH vs. AAPL
RH (RH) and AAPL (Apple Inc) are both stocks. RH operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while AAPL operates in Consumer Electronics (Technology). Over the past 10 years, RH returned 16.18%/yr vs 30.12%/yr for AAPL. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RH vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RH achieves a -14.90% return, which is significantly lower than AAPL's 14.34% return. Over the past 10 years, RH has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 16.18%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 30.12% annualized return.
RH
- 1D
- -2.36%
- 1M
- 24.60%
- YTD
- -14.90%
- 6M
- -6.07%
- 1Y
- -13.73%
- 3Y*
- -15.45%
- 5Y*
- -24.30%
- 10Y*
- 16.18%
AAPL
- 1D
- -1.57%
- 1M
- 12.18%
- YTD
- 14.34%
- 6M
- 9.39%
- 1Y
- 53.24%
- 3Y*
- 20.25%
- 5Y*
- 20.38%
- 10Y*
- 30.12%
RH vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
Correlation
The correlation between RH and AAPL is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2012 | 0.30 |
Fundamentals
RH:
$3.00B
AAPL:
$4.58T
RH:
$6.32
AAPL:
$8.24
RH:
24.13
AAPL:
37.67
RH:
0.88
AAPL:
10.23
RH:
49.58
AAPL:
43.03
RH:
$3.44B
AAPL:
$451.44B
RH:
$1.52B
AAPL:
$216.07B
RH:
$501.48M
AAPL:
$153.63B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RH vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank
RH
AAPL
RH vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RH (RH) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RH | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | 2.40 | -2.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.08 | 3.36 | -3.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.43 | -0.42 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.25 | 3.88 | -4.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.46 | 9.76 | -10.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RH | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 | 2.40 | -2.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.40 | 0.75 | -1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | 1.05 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.44 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
RH vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RH drawdown since its inception was -84.72%, roughly equal to the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RH and AAPL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RH | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.72% | -81.80% | -2.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.04% | -13.80% | -41.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -75.17% | -33.36% | -41.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.72% | -33.36% | -51.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.72% | -38.52% | -46.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.36% | -1.57% | -77.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.97% | -29.61% | -5.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.17% | 5.47% | +24.70% |
Volatility
RH vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison
RH (RH) has a higher volatility of 14.98% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 5.46%. This indicates that RH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RH | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.98% | 5.46% | +9.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.90% | 15.91% | +28.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.54% | 22.32% | +38.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.60% | 27.46% | +34.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.28% | 28.89% | +35.39% |
Dividends
RH vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison
RH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AAPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%.
Financials
RH vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between RH and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RH vs. AAPL - Profitability Comparison
RH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RH reported a gross profit of 361.43M and revenue of 842.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.9%.
AAPL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 54.78B and revenue of 111.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.3%.
RH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RH reported an operating income of 93.37M and revenue of 842.62M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.1%.
AAPL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 35.89B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.3%.
RH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RH reported a net income of 28.78M and revenue of 842.62M, resulting in a net margin of 3.4%.
AAPL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a net income of 29.58B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in a net margin of 26.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RH and AAPL have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RH has higher volatility (14.98%) compared to AAPL (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RH dropped -84.72% vs AAPL's -81.80%.
AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RH and AAPL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer