RH vs. QQQ
RH (RH) is a stock, while QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 10 years, RH returned 16.18%/yr vs 21.94%/yr for QQQ. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RH vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RH achieves a -14.90% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.30% return. Over the past 10 years, RH has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 16.18%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.94% annualized return.
RH
- 1D
- -2.36%
- 1M
- 24.60%
- YTD
- -14.90%
- 6M
- -6.07%
- 1Y
- -13.73%
- 3Y*
- -15.45%
- 5Y*
- -24.30%
- 10Y*
- 16.18%
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 10.60%
- YTD
- 21.30%
- 6M
- 19.66%
- 1Y
- 41.82%
- 3Y*
- 28.78%
- 5Y*
- 17.97%
- 10Y*
- 21.94%
RH vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RH RH | -14.90% | -54.48% | 35.03% | 9.09% | -50.15% | 19.76% | 109.61% | 78.18% | 38.99% | 180.81% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 21.30% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between RH and QQQ is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2012 | 0.42 |
The correlation between RH and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RH vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
RH
QQQ
RH vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RH (RH) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RH | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.45 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.25 | 3.51 | -3.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.46 | 13.49 | -13.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RH | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 | 2.64 | -2.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.40 | 0.81 | -1.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | 0.99 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.41 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
RH vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RH drawdown since its inception was -84.72%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RH and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RH | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.72% | -82.97% | -1.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.04% | -11.96% | -43.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -75.17% | -22.77% | -52.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.72% | -35.12% | -49.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.72% | -35.12% | -49.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.36% | -0.26% | -79.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.97% | -32.79% | -2.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.17% | 3.11% | +27.06% |
Volatility
RH vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
RH (RH) has a higher volatility of 14.98% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 4.49%. This indicates that RH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RH | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.98% | 4.49% | +10.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.90% | 12.10% | +32.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.54% | 15.94% | +44.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.60% | 22.38% | +39.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.28% | 22.29% | +41.99% |
Dividends
RH vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
RH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
RH RH | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RH and QQQ have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RH has higher volatility (14.98%) compared to QQQ (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RH dropped -84.72% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RH and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer