RH vs. CSX
RH (RH) and CSX (CSX Corporation) are both stocks. RH operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while CSX operates in Railroads (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, RH returned 17.79%/yr vs 20.02%/yr for CSX. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RH vs. CSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RH achieves a -20.88% return, which is significantly lower than CSX's 28.15% return. Over the past 10 years, RH has underperformed CSX with an annualized return of 17.79%, while CSX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.02% annualized return.
RH
- 1D
- -3.39%
- 1M
- 3.90%
- YTD
- -20.88%
- 6M
- -22.28%
- 1Y
- -23.89%
- 3Y*
- -21.31%
- 5Y*
- -26.86%
- 10Y*
- 17.79%
CSX
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 1.72%
- YTD
- 28.15%
- 6M
- 26.96%
- 1Y
- 44.39%
- 3Y*
- 13.75%
- 5Y*
- 9.27%
- 10Y*
- 20.02%
RH vs. CSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RH RH | -20.88% | -54.48% | 35.03% | 9.09% | -50.15% | 19.76% | 109.61% | 78.18% | 38.99% | 180.81% |
CSX CSX Corporation | 28.15% | 14.13% | -5.65% | 13.51% | -16.58% | 25.70% | 27.09% | 18.06% | 14.47% | 55.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between RH and CSX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2012 | 0.31 |
Fundamentals
RH:
$2.67B
CSX:
$85.95B
RH:
$5.28
CSX:
$1.63
RH:
26.85
CSX:
28.23
RH:
0.81
CSX:
6.09
RH:
46.92
CSX:
6.33
RH:
$3.43B
CSX:
$14.15B
RH:
$1.49B
CSX:
$3.64B
RH:
$440.85M
CSX:
$5.55B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RH vs. CSX — Risk / Return Rank
RH
CSX
RH vs. CSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RH (RH) and CSX Corporation (CSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RH | CSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.35 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.44 | 3.75 | -4.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.76 | 9.98 | -10.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RH vs. CSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RH drawdown since its inception was -84.72%, which is greater than CSX's maximum drawdown of -69.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RH and CSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RH | CSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.72% | -69.19% | -15.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.04% | -11.89% | -43.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -75.17% | -29.44% | -45.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.72% | -29.44% | -55.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.72% | -40.55% | -44.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -80.81% | -2.96% | -77.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.13% | -15.90% | -19.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.57% | 4.46% | +27.11% |
Volatility
RH vs. CSX - Volatility Comparison
RH (RH) has a higher volatility of 18.13% compared to CSX Corporation (CSX) at 6.56%. This indicates that RH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RH | CSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.13% | 6.56% | +11.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.77% | 16.42% | +30.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.30% | 22.40% | +38.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.56% | 23.51% | +38.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.05% | 27.80% | +36.25% |
Dividends
RH vs. CSX - Dividend Comparison
RH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSX CSX Corporation | 1.17% | 1.43% | 1.49% | 1.27% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.15% | 1.33% | 1.42% | 1.42% | 2.00% | 2.70% |
RH RH | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
RH vs. CSX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between RH and CSX Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RH vs. CSX - Profitability Comparison
RH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RH reported a gross profit of 331.26M and revenue of 800.33M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.4%.
CSX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CSX Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
RH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RH reported an operating income of 34.24M and revenue of 800.33M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.
CSX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CSX Corporation reported an operating income of 1.25B and revenue of 3.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.0%.
RH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RH reported a net income of -13.70M and revenue of 800.33M, resulting in a net margin of -1.7%.
CSX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CSX Corporation reported a net income of 807.00M and revenue of 3.48B, resulting in a net margin of 23.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RH and CSX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RH has higher volatility (18.13%) compared to CSX (6.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RH dropped -84.72% vs CSX's -69.19%.
CSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RH and CSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer