PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RH vs. LOVE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RH vs. LOVE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RH (RH) and The Lovesac Company (LOVE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RH achieves a -14.90% return, which is significantly lower than LOVE's 4.61% return.


RH

1D
-2.36%
1M
24.60%
YTD
-14.90%
6M
-6.07%
1Y
-13.73%
3Y*
-15.45%
5Y*
-24.30%
10Y*
16.18%

LOVE

1D
-0.26%
1M
0.06%
YTD
4.61%
6M
9.36%
1Y
-21.07%
3Y*
-12.66%
5Y*
-28.60%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RH vs. LOVE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
RH
RH
-14.90%-54.48%35.03%9.09%-50.15%19.76%109.61%78.18%-17.01%
LOVE
The Lovesac Company
4.61%-37.66%-7.40%16.08%-66.78%53.77%168.47%-30.03%-4.38%

Correlation

The correlation between RH and LOVE is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2018

0.47

The correlation between RH and LOVE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RH:

$3.00B

LOVE:

$226.55M

EPS

RH:

$6.32

LOVE:

$0.28

PE Ratio

RH:

24.13

LOVE:

55.62

PS Ratio

RH:

0.88

LOVE:

0.32

PB Ratio

RH:

49.58

LOVE:

1.04

Total Revenue (TTM)

RH:

$3.44B

LOVE:

$697.12M

Gross Profit (TTM)

RH:

$1.52B

LOVE:

$393.22M

EBITDA (TTM)

RH:

$501.48M

LOVE:

$20.57M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RH vs. LOVE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RH
RH Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
RH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
RH Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
RH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
RH Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

LOVE
LOVE Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
LOVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOVE Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
LOVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOVE Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RH vs. LOVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RH (RH) and The Lovesac Company (LOVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RHLOVEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

0.98

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.25

-0.43

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.46

-0.77

+0.31

RH vs. LOVE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RH Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is higher than the LOVE Sharpe Ratio of -0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RH and LOVE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RHLOVEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

-0.37

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.40

-0.43

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

-0.07

+0.28

Drawdowns

RH vs. LOVE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RH drawdown since its inception was -84.72%, smaller than the maximum LOVE drawdown of -90.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RH and LOVE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RHLOVEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.72%

-90.79%

+6.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.04%

-49.55%

-5.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-75.17%

-72.72%

-2.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.72%

-88.47%

+3.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-84.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-79.36%

-83.12%

+3.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.97%

-55.00%

+20.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.17%

27.54%

+2.63%

Volatility

RH vs. LOVE - Volatility Comparison

RH (RH) has a higher volatility of 14.98% compared to The Lovesac Company (LOVE) at 9.28%. This indicates that RH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LOVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RHLOVEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.98%

9.28%

+5.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.90%

39.02%

+5.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.54%

57.60%

+2.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.60%

67.34%

-5.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

64.28%

76.80%

-12.52%

Dividends

RH vs. LOVE - Dividend Comparison

Neither RH nor LOVE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

RH vs. LOVE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between RH and The Lovesac Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
842.62M
248.05M
(RH) Total Revenue
(LOVE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RH vs. LOVE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between RH and The Lovesac Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
42.9%
58.1%
Portfolio components
RH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RH reported a gross profit of 361.43M and revenue of 842.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.9%.

LOVE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Lovesac Company reported a gross profit of 144.00M and revenue of 248.05M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.1%.

RH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RH reported an operating income of 93.37M and revenue of 842.62M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.1%.

LOVE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Lovesac Company reported an operating income of 44.94M and revenue of 248.05M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.

RH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RH reported a net income of 28.78M and revenue of 842.62M, resulting in a net margin of 3.4%.

LOVE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Lovesac Company reported a net income of 32.11M and revenue of 248.05M, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RH and LOVE have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RH has higher volatility (14.98%) compared to LOVE (9.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RH dropped -84.72% vs LOVE's -90.79%.

RH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.23 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RH and LOVE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer