RH vs. LOVE
RH (RH) and LOVE (The Lovesac Company) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — RH in Specialty Retail, LOVE in Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances. Over the past 5 years, RH returned -26.86%/yr vs -27.41%/yr for LOVE. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RH vs. LOVE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RH achieves a -20.88% return, which is significantly lower than LOVE's -1.08% return.
RH
- 1D
- -3.39%
- 1M
- 3.90%
- YTD
- -20.88%
- 6M
- -22.28%
- 1Y
- -23.89%
- 3Y*
- -21.31%
- 5Y*
- -26.86%
- 10Y*
- 17.79%
LOVE
- 1D
- 4.21%
- 1M
- -9.72%
- YTD
- -1.08%
- 6M
- 0.83%
- 1Y
- -21.56%
- 3Y*
- -17.42%
- 5Y*
- -27.41%
- 10Y*
- —
RH vs. LOVE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RH RH | -20.88% | -54.48% | 35.03% | 9.09% | -50.15% | 19.76% | 109.61% | 78.18% | -17.69% |
LOVE The Lovesac Company | -1.08% | -37.66% | -7.40% | 16.08% | -66.78% | 53.77% | 168.47% | -30.03% | -8.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between RH and LOVE is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2018 | 0.47 |
The correlation between RH and LOVE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
RH:
$2.67B
LOVE:
$214.01M
RH:
$5.28
LOVE:
$0.26
RH:
26.85
LOVE:
56.10
RH:
0.81
LOVE:
0.31
RH:
46.92
LOVE:
1.04
RH:
$3.43B
LOVE:
$696.94M
RH:
$1.49B
LOVE:
$390.82M
RH:
$440.85M
LOVE:
$20.36M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RH vs. LOVE — Risk / Return Rank
RH
LOVE
RH vs. LOVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RH (RH) and The Lovesac Company (LOVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RH | LOVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 0.97 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.44 | -0.44 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.76 | -0.79 | +0.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RH vs. LOVE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RH drawdown since its inception was -84.72%, smaller than the maximum LOVE drawdown of -90.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RH and LOVE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RH | LOVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.72% | -90.79% | +6.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.04% | -49.20% | -5.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -75.17% | -72.72% | -2.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.72% | -87.61% | +2.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -80.81% | -84.04% | +3.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.13% | -55.26% | +20.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.57% | 27.43% | +4.14% |
Volatility
RH vs. LOVE - Volatility Comparison
RH (RH) has a higher volatility of 18.13% compared to The Lovesac Company (LOVE) at 15.91%. This indicates that RH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LOVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RH | LOVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.13% | 15.91% | +2.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.77% | 38.81% | +7.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.30% | 55.81% | +5.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.56% | 67.24% | -5.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.05% | 76.71% | -12.66% |
Dividends
RH vs. LOVE - Dividend Comparison
Neither RH nor LOVE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
RH vs. LOVE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between RH and The Lovesac Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RH vs. LOVE - Profitability Comparison
RH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RH reported a gross profit of 331.26M and revenue of 800.33M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.4%.
LOVE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Lovesac Company reported a gross profit of 71.97M and revenue of 138.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.1%.
RH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RH reported an operating income of 34.24M and revenue of 800.33M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.
LOVE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Lovesac Company reported an operating income of -17.37M and revenue of 138.20M, resulting in an operating margin of -12.6%.
RH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RH reported a net income of -13.70M and revenue of 800.33M, resulting in a net margin of -1.7%.
LOVE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Lovesac Company reported a net income of -11.09M and revenue of 138.20M, resulting in a net margin of -8.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RH and LOVE have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RH has higher volatility (18.13%) compared to LOVE (15.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RH dropped -84.72% vs LOVE's -90.79%.
LOVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.39 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RH and LOVE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer