RH vs. XLK

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about RH (RH) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK).

XLK is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998.

Performance

RH vs. XLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RH (RH) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RH vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RH RH	-37.01%	-54.48%	35.03%	9.09%	-50.15%	19.76%	109.61%	78.18%	38.99%	180.81%
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF	-6.18%	24.61%	21.63%	56.02%	-27.73%	34.74%	43.62%	49.86%	-1.68%	34.26%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RH achieves a -37.01% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's -6.18% return. Over the past 10 years, RH has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 9.93%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 21.00% annualized return.

RH

• 1D: -19.29%
• 1M: -28.27%
• YTD: -37.01%
• 6M: -43.80%
• 1Y: -52.79%
• 3Y*: -22.62%
• 5Y*: -28.30%
• 10Y*: 9.93%

XLK

• 1D: 1.51%
• 1M: -3.20%
• YTD: -6.18%
• 6M: -4.94%
• 1Y: 30.47%
• 3Y*: 22.19%
• 5Y*: 15.65%
• 10Y*: 21.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

RH vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RH

RH Risk / Return Rank: 10
RH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
RH Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
RH Omega Ratio Rank: 16
RH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
RH Martin Ratio Rank: 2

XLK

XLK Risk / Return Rank: 65
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 63
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RH vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RH (RH) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RH	XLK	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.64	1.13	-1.77
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.64	1.71	-2.34
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	1.24	-0.33
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.94	1.97	-2.92
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.91	6.31	-8.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RH vs. XLK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RH Sharpe Ratio is -0.64, which is lower than the XLK Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RH and XLK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RH	XLK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.64	1.13	-1.77
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.46	0.64	-1.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.16	0.87	-0.71
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.17	0.36	-0.19

Correlation

The correlation between RH and XLK is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

RH vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison

RH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RH RH	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF	0.57%	0.54%	0.66%	0.76%	1.04%	0.65%	0.92%	1.16%	1.60%	1.37%	1.74%	1.79%

Drawdowns

RH vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RH drawdown since its inception was -84.72%, roughly equal to the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RH and XLK.

Drawdown Indicators

	RH	XLK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.72%	-82.05%	-2.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-55.04%	-15.92%	-39.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-84.72%	-33.56%	-51.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-84.72%	-33.56%	-51.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-84.72%	-11.04%	-73.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.37%	-35.17%	+0.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	27.14%	4.98%	+22.16%

Volatility

RH vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison

RH (RH) has a higher volatility of 26.20% compared to State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) at 8.12%. This indicates that RH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RH	XLK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	26.20%	8.12%	+18.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.92%	16.49%	+29.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	82.36%	27.05%	+55.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	61.18%	24.72%	+36.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	64.19%	24.33%	+39.86%