RGR vs. CCJ
RGR (Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc.) and CCJ (Cameco Corporation) are both stocks. RGR operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while CCJ operates in Uranium (Energy). Over the past 10 years, RGR returned -0.27%/yr vs 26.48%/yr for CCJ. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RGR vs. CCJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGR achieves a 21.24% return, which is significantly lower than CCJ's 24.63% return. Over the past 10 years, RGR has underperformed CCJ with an annualized return of -0.27%, while CCJ has yielded a comparatively higher 26.48% annualized return.
RGR
- 1D
- 1.65%
- 1M
- -5.43%
- YTD
- 21.24%
- 6M
- 22.85%
- 1Y
- 11.38%
- 3Y*
- -6.66%
- 5Y*
- -9.29%
- 10Y*
- -0.27%
CCJ
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -0.38%
- YTD
- 24.63%
- 6M
- 21.18%
- 1Y
- 90.56%
- 3Y*
- 54.85%
- 5Y*
- 40.06%
- 10Y*
- 26.48%
RGR vs. CCJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGR Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. | 21.24% | -6.13% | -20.91% | -8.04% | -15.41% | 9.30% | 50.28% | -10.14% | -2.84% | 8.65% |
CCJ Cameco Corporation | 24.63% | 78.38% | 19.47% | 90.49% | 4.35% | 63.19% | 51.47% | -21.08% | 23.58% | -8.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between RGR and CCJ is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 1996 | 0.16 |
The correlation between RGR and CCJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (3 years) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RGR:
$639.98M
CCJ:
$49.67B
RGR:
-$0.73
CCJ:
$1.49
RGR:
1.17
CCJ:
14.03
RGR:
2.26
CCJ:
7.01
RGR:
$551.68M
CCJ:
$3.54B
RGR:
$79.33M
CCJ:
$1.04B
RGR:
-$2.50M
CCJ:
$996.66M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGR vs. CCJ — Risk / Return Rank
RGR
CCJ
RGR vs. CCJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. (RGR) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RGR | CCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.29 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.29 | 3.54 | -3.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.65 | 7.99 | -7.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RGR | CCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 | 1.66 | -1.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.31 | 0.81 | -1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.01 | 0.57 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.24 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
RGR vs. CCJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGR drawdown since its inception was -79.69%, smaller than the maximum CCJ drawdown of -87.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGR and CCJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGR | CCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.69% | -87.53% | +7.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.79% | -25.69% | -13.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.00% | -40.01% | -5.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.59% | -40.01% | -20.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.59% | -57.22% | -3.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.85% | -14.97% | -30.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.96% | -46.10% | +14.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.49% | 11.37% | +6.12% |
Volatility
RGR vs. CCJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. (RGR) is 8.27%, while Cameco Corporation (CCJ) has a volatility of 15.53%. This indicates that RGR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RGR | CCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.27% | 15.53% | -7.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.71% | 38.06% | -18.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.38% | 54.90% | -19.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.35% | 49.68% | -19.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.16% | 46.59% | -13.43% |
Dividends
RGR vs. CCJ - Dividend Comparison
RGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than CCJ's 0.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCJ Cameco Corporation | 0.15% | 0.19% | 0.22% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 0.29% | 0.46% | 0.67% | 0.53% | 4.33% | 3.82% | 3.24% |
RGR Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. | 0.99% | 1.90% | 1.95% | 2.79% | 14.66% | 4.94% | 10.00% | 1.74% | 2.07% | 2.44% | 3.28% | 1.85% |
Financials
RGR vs. CCJ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. and Cameco Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RGR vs. CCJ - Profitability Comparison
RGR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 28.08M and revenue of 141.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.9%.
CCJ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cameco Corporation reported a gross profit of 291.00M and revenue of 847.55M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.3%.
RGR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. reported an operating income of -1.95M and revenue of 141.36M, resulting in an operating margin of -1.4%.
CCJ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cameco Corporation reported an operating income of 154.28M and revenue of 847.55M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.2%.
RGR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. reported a net income of 128.00K and revenue of 141.36M, resulting in a net margin of 0.1%.
CCJ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cameco Corporation reported a net income of 131.09M and revenue of 847.55M, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RGR and CCJ have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CCJ has higher volatility (15.53%) compared to RGR (8.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGR dropped -79.69% vs CCJ's -87.53%.
CCJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RGR and CCJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer