RGR vs. CCJ
Compare and contrast key facts about Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. (RGR) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ).
Performance
RGR vs. CCJ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RGR vs. CCJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGR Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. | 23.04% | -6.13% | -20.91% | -8.04% | -15.41% | 9.30% | 50.28% | -10.14% | -2.84% | 8.65% |
CCJ Cameco Corporation | 18.71% | 78.38% | 19.47% | 90.49% | 4.35% | 63.19% | 51.47% | -21.08% | 23.58% | -8.20% |
Fundamentals
RGR:
-$0.72
CCJ:
$1.35
RGR:
1.11
CCJ:
13.59
RGR:
$395.00M
CCJ:
$3.48B
RGR:
$54.20M
CCJ:
$1.02B
RGR:
-$1.84M
CCJ:
$1.05B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGR achieves a 23.04% return, which is significantly higher than CCJ's 18.71% return. Over the past 10 years, RGR has underperformed CCJ with an annualized return of -1.81%, while CCJ has yielded a comparatively higher 25.21% annualized return.
RGR
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 7.30%
- YTD
- 23.04%
- 6M
- -7.46%
- 1Y
- 3.35%
- 3Y*
- -9.77%
- 5Y*
- -5.88%
- 10Y*
- -1.81%
CCJ
- 1D
- 5.61%
- 1M
- -8.27%
- YTD
- 18.71%
- 6M
- 29.77%
- 1Y
- 164.39%
- 3Y*
- 61.02%
- 5Y*
- 44.84%
- 10Y*
- 25.21%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGR vs. CCJ — Risk / Return Rank
RGR
CCJ
RGR vs. CCJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. (RGR) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RGR | CCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.09 | 3.03 | -2.94 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.36 | 3.56 | -3.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.44 | -0.38 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.08 | 6.23 | -6.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.17 | 16.57 | -16.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RGR | CCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 | 3.03 | -2.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.19 | 0.91 | -1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.05 | 0.55 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.24 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between RGR and CCJ is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RGR vs. CCJ - Dividend Comparison
RGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, more than CCJ's 0.16% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGR Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. | 1.15% | 1.90% | 1.95% | 2.79% | 14.66% | 4.94% | 10.00% | 1.74% | 2.07% | 2.44% | 3.28% | 1.85% |
CCJ Cameco Corporation | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.22% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 0.29% | 0.46% | 0.67% | 0.53% | 4.33% | 3.82% | 3.24% |
Drawdowns
RGR vs. CCJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGR drawdown since its inception was -79.69%, smaller than the maximum CCJ drawdown of -87.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGR and CCJ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGR | CCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.69% | -87.53% | +7.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.79% | -25.69% | -13.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.59% | -40.01% | -20.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.59% | -57.22% | -3.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.04% | -19.00% | -26.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.89% | -46.29% | +14.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.87% | 9.67% | +8.20% |
Volatility
RGR vs. CCJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. (RGR) is 10.81%, while Cameco Corporation (CCJ) has a volatility of 17.51%. This indicates that RGR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RGR | CCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.81% | 17.51% | -6.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.36% | 41.70% | -10.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.08% | 54.64% | -15.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.38% | 49.71% | -19.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.39% | 46.28% | -12.89% |
Financials
RGR vs. CCJ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. and Cameco Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities