RGR vs. META
Compare and contrast key facts about Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. (RGR) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RGR or META.
Correlation
The correlation between RGR and META is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
RGR vs. META - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
RGR:
-0.78
META:
2.03
RGR:
-0.97
META:
2.91
RGR:
0.88
META:
1.40
RGR:
-0.34
META:
4.01
RGR:
-1.66
META:
12.39
RGR:
10.64%
META:
5.97%
RGR:
22.69%
META:
36.35%
RGR:
-79.69%
META:
-76.74%
RGR:
-52.13%
META:
-5.53%
Fundamentals
RGR:
$607.99M
META:
$1.56T
RGR:
$1.73
META:
$21.18
RGR:
20.93
META:
29.25
RGR:
0.00
META:
1.00
RGR:
$520.49M
META:
$156.23B
RGR:
$113.49M
META:
$127.21B
RGR:
$55.96M
META:
$77.82B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGR achieves a -20.44% return, which is significantly lower than META's 69.36% return. Over the past 10 years, RGR has underperformed META with an annualized return of 4.34%, while META has yielded a comparatively higher 22.38% annualized return.
RGR
-20.44%
-6.39%
-15.61%
-19.59%
0.23%
4.34%
META
69.36%
7.81%
19.77%
71.10%
23.87%
22.38%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RGR vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. (RGR) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RGR vs. META - Dividend Comparison
RGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, more than META's 0.33% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGR Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. | 1.94% | 2.79% | 14.66% | 4.94% | 10.00% | 1.74% | 2.07% | 2.44% | 3.28% | 1.85% | 4.68% | 2.91% |
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RGR vs. META - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGR drawdown since its inception was -79.69%, roughly equal to the maximum META drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGR and META. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RGR vs. META - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. (RGR) is 7.03%, while Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) has a volatility of 7.85%. This indicates that RGR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
RGR vs. META - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities