PortfoliosLab logo
RGR vs. NOC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between RGR and NOC is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

RGR vs. NOC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. (RGR) and Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RGR:

-0.40

NOC:

0.06

Sortino Ratio

RGR:

-0.38

NOC:

0.18

Omega Ratio

RGR:

0.94

NOC:

1.03

Calmar Ratio

RGR:

-0.22

NOC:

0.00

Martin Ratio

RGR:

-0.87

NOC:

0.01

Ulcer Index

RGR:

14.06%

NOC:

8.70%

Daily Std Dev

RGR:

30.37%

NOC:

25.62%

Max Drawdown

RGR:

-79.69%

NOC:

-69.38%

Current Drawdown

RGR:

-49.66%

NOC:

-13.20%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RGR:

$608.40M

NOC:

$65.67B

EPS

RGR:

$1.83

NOC:

$25.32

PE Ratio

RGR:

20.08

NOC:

18.02

PEG Ratio

RGR:

0.00

NOC:

3.05

PS Ratio

RGR:

0.83

NOC:

1.63

PB Ratio

RGR:

1.90

NOC:

4.52

Total Revenue (TTM)

RGR:

$534.56M

NOC:

$40.37B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RGR:

$114.91M

NOC:

$7.81B

EBITDA (TTM)

RGR:

$53.52M

NOC:

$5.70B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGR achieves a 5.78% return, which is significantly higher than NOC's 0.40% return. Over the past 10 years, RGR has underperformed NOC with an annualized return of -0.06%, while NOC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.36% annualized return.


RGR

YTD

5.78%

1M

-4.20%

6M

-2.62%

1Y

-12.17%

5Y*

-3.11%

10Y*

-0.06%

NOC

YTD

0.40%

1M

-11.39%

6M

-5.44%

1Y

1.59%

5Y*

9.67%

10Y*

13.36%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

RGR vs. NOC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RGR is 2828
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RGR is 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RGR is 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RGR is 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RGR is 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RGR is 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

NOC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NOC is 4848
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NOC is 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NOC is 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NOC is 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NOC is 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NOC is 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RGR vs. NOC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. (RGR) and Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current RGR Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is lower than the NOC Sharpe Ratio of 0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGR and NOC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

RGR vs. NOC - Dividend Comparison

RGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, more than NOC's 1.76% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RGR
Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc.
2.37%1.95%2.79%14.66%4.94%10.00%1.74%2.07%2.44%3.28%1.85%4.68%
NOC
Northrop Grumman Corporation
1.76%1.72%1.57%1.24%1.59%1.86%1.50%1.92%1.27%1.50%1.64%1.84%

Drawdowns

RGR vs. NOC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGR drawdown since its inception was -79.69%, which is greater than NOC's maximum drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGR and NOC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

RGR vs. NOC - Volatility Comparison

Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. (RGR) has a higher volatility of 20.37% compared to Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) at 15.30%. This indicates that RGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

RGR vs. NOC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. and Northrop Grumman Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20212022202320242025
135.74M
9.47B
(RGR) Total Revenue
(NOC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RGR vs. NOC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. and Northrop Grumman Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%20212022202320242025
22.0%
16.7%
(RGR) Gross Margin
(NOC) Gross Margin
RGR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 29.90M and revenue of 135.74M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.0%.

NOC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Northrop Grumman Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.58B and revenue of 9.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.7%.

RGR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 8.47M and revenue of 135.74M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.2%.

NOC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Northrop Grumman Corporation reported an operating income of 573.00M and revenue of 9.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.1%.

RGR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. reported a net income of 7.77M and revenue of 135.74M, resulting in a net margin of 5.7%.

NOC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Northrop Grumman Corporation reported a net income of 481.00M and revenue of 9.47B, resulting in a net margin of 5.1%.