RGR vs. NOC
Compare and contrast key facts about Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. (RGR) and Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RGR or NOC.
Correlation
The correlation between RGR and NOC is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
RGR vs. NOC - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
RGR:
-0.91
NOC:
0.25
RGR:
-1.17
NOC:
0.47
RGR:
0.85
NOC:
1.06
RGR:
-0.39
NOC:
0.21
RGR:
-1.88
NOC:
0.71
RGR:
10.88%
NOC:
6.24%
RGR:
22.58%
NOC:
17.87%
RGR:
-79.69%
NOC:
-69.38%
RGR:
-53.00%
NOC:
-13.30%
Fundamentals
RGR:
$607.99M
NOC:
$69.98B
RGR:
$1.73
NOC:
$16.23
RGR:
20.93
NOC:
29.59
RGR:
0.00
NOC:
0.84
RGR:
$520.49M
NOC:
$40.99B
RGR:
$113.49M
NOC:
$6.92B
RGR:
$55.96M
NOC:
$4.57B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGR achieves a -21.90% return, which is significantly lower than NOC's 1.99% return. Over the past 10 years, RGR has underperformed NOC with an annualized return of 3.93%, while NOC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.85% annualized return.
RGR
-21.90%
-6.53%
-13.80%
-21.32%
-0.14%
3.93%
NOC
1.99%
-4.16%
9.56%
3.97%
8.07%
13.85%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RGR vs. NOC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. (RGR) and Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RGR vs. NOC - Dividend Comparison
RGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, more than NOC's 1.71% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGR Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. | 1.98% | 2.79% | 14.66% | 4.94% | 10.00% | 1.74% | 2.07% | 2.44% | 3.28% | 1.85% | 4.68% | 2.91% |
NOC Northrop Grumman Corporation | 1.71% | 1.57% | 1.24% | 1.59% | 1.86% | 1.50% | 1.92% | 1.27% | 1.50% | 1.64% | 1.84% | 2.08% |
Drawdowns
RGR vs. NOC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGR drawdown since its inception was -79.69%, which is greater than NOC's maximum drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGR and NOC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RGR vs. NOC - Volatility Comparison
Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. (RGR) has a higher volatility of 6.67% compared to Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) at 4.80%. This indicates that RGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
RGR vs. NOC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. and Northrop Grumman Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities