RGLO vs. GXTG

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

RGLO (Russell Investments Global Equity ETF) and GXTG (Global X Thematic Growth ETF) are both Global Equities funds. RGLO is actively managed, while GXTG is passively managed. Over the past year, RGLO returned 24.03% vs -4.05% for GXTG. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RGLO charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for GXTG.

Performance

RGLO vs. GXTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments Global Equity ETF (RGLO) and Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGLO achieves a 10.75% return, which is significantly higher than GXTG's 1.70% return.

RGLO

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 1.62%
• 6M: 8.60%
• YTD: 10.75%
• 1Y: 24.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GXTG

• 1D: 1.18%
• 1M: -11.94%
• 6M: -5.62%
• YTD: 1.70%
• 1Y: -4.05%
• 3Y*: -4.23%
• 5Y*: -12.06%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGLO vs. GXTG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RGLO Russell Investments Global Equity ETF	10.75%	17.96%
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF	1.70%	-0.52%

Correlation

The correlation between RGLO and GXTG is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2025	0.74

The correlation between RGLO and GXTG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RGLO vs. GXTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGLO

RGLO Risk / Return Rank: 70
RGLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
RGLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
RGLO Omega Ratio Rank: 70
RGLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
RGLO Martin Ratio Rank: 74

GXTG

GXTG Risk / Return Rank: 8
GXTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
GXTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
GXTG Omega Ratio Rank: 8
GXTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
GXTG Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGLO vs. GXTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Global Equity ETF (RGLO) and Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RGLO	GXTG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	-0.14	+1.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.55	0.01	+2.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.00	+0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.51	-0.17	+2.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.85	-0.36	+11.21

RGLO vs. GXTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGLO Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the GXTG Sharpe Ratio of -0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGLO and GXTG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RGLO vs. GXTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGLO drawdown since its inception was -9.61%, smaller than the maximum GXTG drawdown of -67.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGLO and GXTG.

Drawdown Indicators

	RGLO	GXTG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.61%	-67.81%	+58.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.61%	-24.65%	+15.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.97%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-61.17%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.47%	-59.80%	+59.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.21%	-43.27%	+42.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.22%	11.33%	-9.11%

Volatility

RGLO vs. GXTG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Russell Investments Global Equity ETF (RGLO) is 3.53%, while Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) has a volatility of 10.60%. This indicates that RGLO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GXTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RGLO	GXTG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.53%	10.60%	-7.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.77%	23.42%	-12.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.26%	29.44%	-16.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.95%	28.39%	-15.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.95%	29.92%	-16.97%

RGLO vs. GXTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGLO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than GXTG's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

RGLO vs. GXTG - Dividend Comparison

RGLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than GXTG's 1.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF	1.47%	1.40%	1.08%	1.99%	1.48%	1.56%	0.48%	0.31%
RGLO Russell Investments Global Equity ETF	0.57%	0.63%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RGLO and GXTG in my portfolio?

RGLO and GXTG have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RGLO or GXTG?

GXTG has higher volatility (10.60%) compared to RGLO (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGLO dropped -9.61% vs GXTG's -67.81%.

Which ETF is better, RGLO or GXTG?

On 1-year performance, RGLO leads with 24.03% vs -4.05% for GXTG. On fees, RGLO is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, RGLO has been the lower-risk option at 3.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RGLO or GXTG?

Over the 1-year period, RGLO has performed better with a 24.03% return vs -4.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RGLO or GXTG?

RGLO is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GXTG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RGLO or GXTG?

GXTG has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 0.57% for RGLO.

What is the main difference between RGLO and GXTG?

They also come from different issuers: Russell and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for RGLO and 0.50% for GXTG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RGLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.