RGLO vs. RINT

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

RGLO (Russell Investments Global Equity ETF) and RINT (Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RGLO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Russell, while RINT is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Russell. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RGLO returned 25.52% vs 24.87% for RINT. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. Both charge a 0.49% expense ratio.

Performance

RGLO vs. RINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments Global Equity ETF (RGLO) and Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RGLO having a 11.23% return and RINT slightly higher at 11.32%.

RGLO

• 1D: 0.82%
• 1M: 1.83%
• 6M: 8.10%
• YTD: 11.23%
• 1Y: 25.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 26.15%

RINT

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: 1.64%
• 6M: 6.58%
• YTD: 11.32%
• 1Y: 24.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 23.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RGLO Russell Investments Global Equity ETF	$807.21K	$816.28K	$983.08K
RINT Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF	$663.68K	$551.61K	$523.28K

RGLO vs. RINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RGLO Russell Investments Global Equity ETF	11.23%	17.96%
RINT Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF	11.32%	13.26%

Correlation

The correlation between RGLO and RINT is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2025	0.83

The correlation between RGLO and RINT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RGLO vs. RINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RGLO

RGLO Risk / Return Rank: 76
RGLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
RGLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
RGLO Omega Ratio Rank: 76
RGLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
RGLO Martin Ratio Rank: 81

RINT

RINT Risk / Return Rank: 65
RINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
RINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
RINT Omega Ratio Rank: 68
RINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
RINT Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RGLO vs. RINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Global Equity ETF (RGLO) and Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RGLO	RINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	1.59	+0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.48	2.26	+0.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.29	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.49	2.06	+0.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.73	7.81	+2.92

RGLO vs. RINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGLO Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the RINT Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGLO and RINT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RGLO vs. RINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGLO drawdown since its inception was -9.61%, smaller than the maximum RINT drawdown of -11.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGLO and RINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	RGLO	RINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.61%	-11.91%	+2.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.61%	-11.91%	+2.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.10%	-0.41%	+0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.22%	-1.74%	+0.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.23%	3.13%	-0.90%

Volatility

RGLO vs. RINT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Russell Investments Global Equity ETF (RGLO) is 4.12%, while Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT) has a volatility of 4.58%. This indicates that RGLO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RGLO	RINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.12%	4.58%	-0.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.94%	13.47%	-2.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.59%	15.46%	-1.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.08%	14.90%	-1.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.08%	14.90%	-1.82%

RGLO vs. RINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RGLO and RINT have an expense ratio of 0.49%.

Dividends

RGLO vs. RINT - Dividend Comparison

RGLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than RINT's 0.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
RGLO Russell Investments Global Equity ETF	0.57%	0.63%
RINT Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF	0.80%	0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RGLO and RINT in my portfolio?

RGLO and RINT have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RGLO or RINT?

RINT has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to RGLO (4.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGLO dropped -9.61% vs RINT's -11.91%.

Which ETF is better, RGLO or RINT?

On 1-year performance, RGLO leads with 25.52% vs 24.87% for RINT. Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. On volatility, RGLO has been the lower-risk option at 4.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RGLO or RINT?

Over the 1-year period, RGLO has performed better with a 25.52% return vs 24.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RGLO or RINT?

RGLO and RINT have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RGLO or RINT?

RINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.57% for RGLO.

What is the main difference between RGLO and RINT?

RGLO is categorized as Global Equities, while RINT is Foreign Large Cap Equities.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RGLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.