RGGYX vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about Victory RS Global Fund (RGGYX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
RGGYX is managed by Victory Capital. It was launched on May 15, 2011. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RGGYX or SCHG.
Key characteristics
| RGGYX | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 23.24% | 34.22% |
| 1Y Return | 35.48% | 47.39% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 7.78% | 11.12% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 13.40% | 21.10% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 8.59% | 16.82% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.87 | 2.71 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.88 | 3.48 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.53 | 1.49 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.89 | 3.74 |
| Martin Ratio | 19.07 | 14.90 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.82% | 3.10% |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.07% | 17.06% |
| Max Drawdown | -31.80% | -34.59% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.16% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between RGGYX and SCHG is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
RGGYX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, RGGYX achieves a 23.24% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 34.22% return. Over the past 10 years, RGGYX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 8.59%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.82% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RGGYX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
RGGYX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RGGYX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory RS Global Fund (RGGYX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RGGYX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
RGGYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, more than SCHG's 0.40% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGGYX Victory RS Global Fund | 0.88% | 1.09% | 1.29% | 1.09% | 0.78% | 1.32% | 1.67% | 0.00% | 2.06% | 1.15% | 0.97% | 1.47% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.40% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% | 1.09% | 1.07% |
Drawdowns
RGGYX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGGYX drawdown since its inception was -31.80%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGGYX and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RGGYX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Victory RS Global Fund (RGGYX) is 3.26%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 5.35%. This indicates that RGGYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.