RGGYX vs. CFIPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Victory RS Global Fund (RGGYX) and Franklin Global Equity Fund (CFIPX).
RGGYX is managed by Victory. It was launched on May 15, 2011. CFIPX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Feb 28, 1991.
Performance
RGGYX vs. CFIPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RGGYX vs. CFIPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGGYX Victory RS Global Fund | -4.16% | 17.14% | 19.94% | 26.95% | -18.80% | 22.77% | 17.27% | 30.69% | -5.14% | 24.78% |
CFIPX Franklin Global Equity Fund | -5.00% | 23.21% | 24.28% | 23.03% | -16.36% | 24.76% | 13.34% | 30.63% | -12.16% | 23.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGGYX achieves a -4.16% return, which is significantly higher than CFIPX's -5.00% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RGGYX having a 12.37% annualized return and CFIPX not far ahead at 12.61%.
RGGYX
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -8.40%
- YTD
- -4.16%
- 6M
- -0.54%
- 1Y
- 17.80%
- 3Y*
- 16.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.31%
- 10Y*
- 12.37%
CFIPX
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -7.68%
- YTD
- -5.00%
- 6M
- -1.63%
- 1Y
- 19.21%
- 3Y*
- 18.74%
- 5Y*
- 11.49%
- 10Y*
- 12.61%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RGGYX vs. CFIPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RGGYX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than CFIPX's 1.30% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RGGYX vs. CFIPX — Risk / Return Rank
RGGYX
CFIPX
RGGYX vs. CFIPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory RS Global Fund (RGGYX) and Franklin Global Equity Fund (CFIPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RGGYX | CFIPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.09 | 1.16 | -0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.60 | 1.70 | -0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.26 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | 1.48 | -0.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.56 | 7.64 | -1.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RGGYX | CFIPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | 1.16 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.72 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | 0.73 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.34 | +0.44 |
Correlation
The correlation between RGGYX and CFIPX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RGGYX vs. CFIPX - Dividend Comparison
RGGYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, less than CFIPX's 6.75% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGGYX Victory RS Global Fund | 1.07% | 1.03% | 1.16% | 1.09% | 1.29% | 3.42% | 0.82% | 1.38% | 4.84% | 8.60% | 10.38% | 3.86% |
CFIPX Franklin Global Equity Fund | 6.75% | 6.41% | 3.49% | 0.99% | 4.99% | 8.99% | 0.73% | 13.31% | 7.86% | 0.77% | 1.52% | 1.01% |
Drawdowns
RGGYX vs. CFIPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGGYX drawdown since its inception was -31.80%, smaller than the maximum CFIPX drawdown of -62.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGGYX and CFIPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGGYX | CFIPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.80% | -62.70% | +30.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.67% | -11.82% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.78% | -24.44% | -2.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.80% | -33.98% | +2.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.02% | -8.28% | -0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.00% | -16.50% | +12.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.40% | 2.29% | +0.11% |
Volatility
RGGYX vs. CFIPX - Volatility Comparison
Victory RS Global Fund (RGGYX) has a higher volatility of 4.92% compared to Franklin Global Equity Fund (CFIPX) at 4.40%. This indicates that RGGYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CFIPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RGGYX | CFIPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.92% | 4.40% | +0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.30% | 8.99% | +0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.51% | 16.89% | -0.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.79% | 16.08% | -0.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 17.23% | -0.51% |