RGA vs. FMBH
RGA (Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated) and FMBH (First Mid Bancshares, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — RGA in Insurance - Reinsurance, FMBH in Banks - Regional. Over the past 10 years, RGA returned 10.78%/yr vs 9.27%/yr for FMBH. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RGA vs. FMBH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGA achieves a 4.97% return, which is significantly lower than FMBH's 21.93% return. Over the past 10 years, RGA has outperformed FMBH with an annualized return of 10.78%, while FMBH has yielded a comparatively lower 9.27% annualized return.
RGA
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- -1.07%
- YTD
- 4.97%
- 6M
- 3.45%
- 1Y
- 8.82%
- 3Y*
- 17.11%
- 5Y*
- 14.96%
- 10Y*
- 10.78%
FMBH
- 1D
- 2.00%
- 1M
- 7.80%
- YTD
- 21.93%
- 6M
- 17.68%
- 1Y
- 32.23%
- 3Y*
- 26.18%
- 5Y*
- 4.59%
- 10Y*
- 9.27%
RGA vs. FMBH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGA Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated | 4.97% | -2.97% | 34.38% | 16.39% | 33.04% | -3.21% | -27.02% | 18.29% | -8.71% | 25.59% |
FMBH First Mid Bancshares, Inc. | 21.93% | 8.71% | 9.10% | 11.60% | -23.21% | 29.81% | -1.79% | 12.89% | -15.58% | 15.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between RGA and FMBH is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2008 | 0.30 |
The correlation between RGA and FMBH shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (all time) to 0.46 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RGA:
$17.91
FMBH:
$3.96
RGA:
11.82
FMBH:
11.87
RGA:
0.45
FMBH:
1.41
RGA:
0.58
FMBH:
2.49
RGA:
$18.13B
FMBH:
$456.37M
RGA:
$3.15B
FMBH:
$230.02M
RGA:
$1.46B
FMBH:
$98.76M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGA vs. FMBH — Risk / Return Rank
RGA
FMBH
RGA vs. FMBH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated (RGA) and First Mid Bancshares, Inc. (FMBH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RGA | FMBH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.23 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.70 | 2.32 | -1.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.64 | 5.78 | -4.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RGA vs. FMBH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGA drawdown since its inception was -65.75%, smaller than the maximum FMBH drawdown of -73.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGA and FMBH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGA | FMBH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.75% | -73.14% | +7.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.68% | -13.93% | +1.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.11% | -27.46% | +0.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.11% | -48.94% | +21.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.75% | -51.27% | -14.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.19% | 0.00% | -6.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.67% | -28.98% | +17.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.38% | 5.59% | -0.21% |
Volatility
RGA vs. FMBH - Volatility Comparison
Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated (RGA) has a higher volatility of 6.78% compared to First Mid Bancshares, Inc. (FMBH) at 6.44%. This indicates that RGA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMBH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RGA | FMBH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.78% | 6.44% | +0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.32% | 16.82% | -0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.47% | 24.79% | -1.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.75% | 27.08% | +0.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.91% | 31.05% | +1.86% |
Dividends
RGA vs. FMBH - Dividend Comparison
RGA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than FMBH's 2.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMBH First Mid Bancshares, Inc. | 2.13% | 2.51% | 2.55% | 2.65% | 2.81% | 1.99% | 2.41% | 2.16% | 2.19% | 1.71% | 1.82% | 2.27% |
RGA Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated | 1.76% | 1.79% | 1.63% | 2.04% | 2.15% | 2.61% | 2.42% | 1.59% | 1.57% | 1.17% | 1.24% | 1.64% |
Financials
RGA vs. FMBH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated and First Mid Bancshares, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RGA vs. FMBH - Profitability Comparison
RGA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 6.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
FMBH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Mid Bancshares, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 100.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
RGA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated reported an operating income of 441.00K and revenue of 6.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.8%.
FMBH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Mid Bancshares, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 100.62M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
RGA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated reported a net income of 331.00K and revenue of 6.49M, resulting in a net margin of 5.1%.
FMBH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Mid Bancshares, Inc. reported a net income of 26.33M and revenue of 100.62M, resulting in a net margin of 26.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RGA and FMBH have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RGA has higher volatility (6.78%) compared to FMBH (6.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGA dropped -65.75% vs FMBH's -73.14%.
FMBH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RGA and FMBH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer