PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RGA vs. META
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

RGA vs. META - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated (RGA) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RGA vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RGA
Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated
0.77%-2.97%34.38%16.39%33.04%-3.21%-27.02%18.29%-8.71%25.59%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
-13.25%13.09%66.05%194.13%-64.22%23.13%33.09%56.57%-25.71%53.38%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RGA:

$13.62B

META:

$1.47T

EPS

RGA:

$17.71

META:

$23.51

PE Ratio

RGA:

11.53

META:

24.34

PEG Ratio

RGA:

0.44

META:

1.00

PS Ratio

RGA:

0.58

META:

7.32

PB Ratio

RGA:

1.01

META:

6.78

Total Revenue (TTM)

RGA:

$23.41B

META:

$200.97B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RGA:

$3.93B

META:

$164.79B

EBITDA (TTM)

RGA:

$1.91B

META:

$104.55B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGA achieves a 0.77% return, which is significantly higher than META's -13.25% return. Over the past 10 years, RGA has underperformed META with an annualized return of 9.87%, while META has yielded a comparatively higher 17.39% annualized return.


RGA

1D
1.96%
1M
-5.36%
YTD
0.77%
6M
7.24%
1Y
5.62%
3Y*
17.64%
5Y*
12.22%
10Y*
9.87%

META

1D
6.67%
1M
-11.66%
YTD
-13.25%
6M
-21.96%
1Y
-0.42%
3Y*
39.60%
5Y*
14.06%
10Y*
17.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RGA vs. META — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGA
RGA Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
RGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGA Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
RGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGA Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

META
META Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
META Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
META Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGA vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated (RGA) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RGAMETADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.20

-0.01

+0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.48

0.29

+0.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.04

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.39

-0.01

+0.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.85

-0.04

+0.88

RGA vs. META - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGA Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is higher than the META Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGA and META, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RGAMETADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

-0.01

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.32

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

0.45

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.55

-0.23

Correlation

The correlation between RGA and META is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

RGA vs. META - Dividend Comparison

RGA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than META's 0.37% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RGA
Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated
1.80%1.79%1.63%2.04%2.15%2.61%2.42%1.59%1.57%1.17%1.24%1.64%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
0.37%0.32%0.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

RGA vs. META - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGA drawdown since its inception was -65.75%, smaller than the maximum META drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGA and META.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RGAMETADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.75%

-76.74%

+10.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.82%

-33.30%

+17.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.41%

-76.74%

+48.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.75%

-76.74%

+10.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.94%

-27.41%

+17.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.68%

-15.19%

+3.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.30%

13.13%

-5.83%

Volatility

RGA vs. META - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated (RGA) is 5.78%, while Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) has a volatility of 13.64%. This indicates that RGA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RGAMETADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.78%

13.64%

-7.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.96%

26.73%

-9.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.98%

39.91%

-11.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.95%

43.77%

-15.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.88%

38.46%

-5.58%

Financials

RGA vs. META - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated and Meta Platforms, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
6.34B
59.89B
(RGA) Total Revenue
(META) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RGA vs. META - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated and Meta Platforms, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
26.3%
81.8%
Portfolio components
RGA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated reported a gross profit of 1.66B and revenue of 6.34B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.3%.

META - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 48.99B and revenue of 59.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.8%.

RGA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated reported an operating income of 510.00M and revenue of 6.34B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.1%.

META - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported an operating income of 24.75B and revenue of 59.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.3%.

RGA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated reported a net income of 463.00M and revenue of 6.34B, resulting in a net margin of 7.3%.

META - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a net income of 22.77B and revenue of 59.89B, resulting in a net margin of 38.0%.