RGA vs. META
Compare and contrast key facts about Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated (RGA) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RGA or META.
Key characteristics
| RGA | META | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 32.48% | 33.46% |
| 1Y Return | 44.47% | 91.38% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 21.71% | 15.10% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 9.51% | 20.60% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 12.92% | 23.26% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.34 | 2.63 |
| Daily Std Dev | 19.66% | 36.02% |
| Max Drawdown | -66.64% | -76.74% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -10.51% |
Fundamentals
| RGA | META | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $13.74B | $1.21T |
| EPS | $12.88 | $17.38 |
| PE Ratio | 16.21 | 27.40 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.57 | 1.16 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $20.65B | $142.71B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $2.03B | $92.86B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $1.39B | $68.45B |
Correlation
The correlation between RGA and META is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
RGA vs. META - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RGA having a 32.48% return and META slightly higher at 33.46%. Over the past 10 years, RGA has underperformed META with an annualized return of 12.92%, while META has yielded a comparatively higher 23.26% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RGA vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated (RGA) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RGA vs. META - Dividend Comparison
RGA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, more than META's 0.11% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGA Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated | 1.60% | 2.04% | 2.15% | 2.61% | 2.42% | 1.59% | 1.57% | 1.17% | 1.24% | 1.64% | 1.44% | 1.40% |
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RGA vs. META - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGA drawdown since its inception was -66.64%, smaller than the maximum META drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGA and META. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RGA vs. META - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated (RGA) is 6.88%, while Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) has a volatility of 14.02%. This indicates that RGA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
RGA vs. META - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated and Meta Platforms, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities