RGA vs. AEM
RGA (Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated) and AEM (Agnico Eagle Mines Limited) are both stocks. RGA operates in Insurance - Reinsurance (Financial Services), while AEM operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, RGA returned 11.32%/yr vs 11.46%/yr for AEM. Their 0.06 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
RGA vs. AEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGA achieves a 17.66% return, which is significantly higher than AEM's -13.95% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RGA having a 11.32% annualized return and AEM not far ahead at 11.46%.
RGA
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 9.83%
- 6M
- 18.07%
- YTD
- 17.66%
- 1Y
- 25.63%
- 3Y*
- 21.10%
- 5Y*
- 19.04%
- 10Y*
- 11.32%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.94%
AEM
- 1D
- -3.64%
- 1M
- -6.19%
- 6M
- -23.42%
- YTD
- -13.95%
- 1Y
- 17.91%
- 3Y*
- 44.82%
- 5Y*
- 20.40%
- 10Y*
- 11.46%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.47%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $362.33M | $376.74M | $426.77M | |
| $80.43M | $84.29M | $82.13M |
RGA vs. AEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGA Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated | 17.66% | -2.97% | 34.38% | 16.39% | 33.04% | -3.21% | -27.02% | 18.29% | -8.71% | 25.59% |
AEM Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | -13.95% | 119.53% | 46.04% | 8.98% | 1.08% | -22.81% | 17.39% | 54.18% | -11.51% | 10.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between RGA and AEM is 0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2008 | 0.06 |
Fundamentals
RGA:
$15.52B
AEM:
$73.56B
RGA:
$20.15
AEM:
$11.60
RGA:
11.76
AEM:
12.52
RGA:
0.45
AEM:
0.19
RGA:
0.58
AEM:
5.06
RGA:
$18.13B
AEM:
$14.43B
RGA:
$3.15B
AEM:
$9.02B
RGA:
$1.46B
AEM:
$10.36B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGA vs. AEM — Risk / Return Rank
RGA
AEM
RGA vs. AEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated (RGA) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RGA | AEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.10 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | 0.39 | +1.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.07 | 0.90 | +4.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RGA vs. AEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGA drawdown since its inception was -65.75%, smaller than the maximum AEM drawdown of -90.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGA and AEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGA | AEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.75% | -90.49% | +24.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.68% | -45.80% | +33.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.11% | -45.80% | +18.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.11% | -45.80% | +18.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.75% | -53.86% | -11.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.39% | -42.25% | +39.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.61% | -46.63% | +35.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.16% | 20.06% | -14.90% |
Volatility
RGA vs. AEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated (RGA) is 7.02%, while Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) has a volatility of 11.20%. This indicates that RGA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RGA | AEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.02% | 11.20% | -4.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.74% | 36.02% | -18.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.88% | 44.77% | -20.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.55% | 37.35% | -9.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.92% | 37.38% | -4.46% |
Dividends
RGA vs. AEM - Dividend Comparison
RGA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, more than AEM's 1.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEM Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | 1.17% | 0.94% | 2.05% | 2.92% | 3.08% | 2.63% | 2.36% | 0.89% | 1.09% | 0.89% | 0.86% | 1.22% |
RGA Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated | 1.76% | 1.79% | 1.63% | 2.04% | 2.15% | 2.61% | 2.42% | 1.59% | 1.57% | 1.17% | 1.24% | 1.64% |
Financials
RGA vs. AEM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RGA vs. AEM - Profitability Comparison
RGA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 6.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
AEM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a gross profit of 2.30B and revenue of 3.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.2%.
RGA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated reported an operating income of 441.00K and revenue of 6.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.8%.
AEM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported an operating income of 2.22B and revenue of 3.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 60.0%.
RGA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated reported a net income of 331.00K and revenue of 6.49M, resulting in a net margin of 5.1%.
AEM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a net income of 1.56B and revenue of 3.71B, resulting in a net margin of 42.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RGA and AEM have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AEM has higher volatility (11.20%) compared to RGA (7.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGA dropped -65.75% vs AEM's -90.49%.
RGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RGA and AEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer