PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RFDI vs. EFAS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RFDI vs. EFAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Developed International ETF (RFDI) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFDI achieves a 7.65% return, which is significantly lower than EFAS's 12.96% return.


RFDI

1D
-0.69%
1M
1.91%
YTD
7.65%
6M
10.55%
1Y
23.94%
3Y*
19.21%
5Y*
8.07%
10Y*
8.56%

EFAS

1D
-0.58%
1M
-0.80%
YTD
12.96%
6M
17.29%
1Y
28.68%
3Y*
24.47%
5Y*
12.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFDI vs. EFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RFDI
First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Developed International ETF
7.65%35.95%5.56%18.14%-23.57%17.36%9.16%20.47%-18.26%24.08%
EFAS
Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF
12.96%46.83%3.07%14.65%-8.00%12.75%-5.42%14.60%-11.60%22.76%

Correlation

The correlation between RFDI and EFAS is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2016

0.73

The correlation between RFDI and EFAS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

RFDI vs. EFAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RFDI
EFAS

Financial Services

27.2%
30.1%

Energy

11.5%
13.7%

Industrials

11.3%
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
1.9%

Healthcare

8.8%
0.1%

Technology

7.9%
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

7.0%
8.1%

Communication Services

4.8%
8.6%

Utilities

4.7%
14.4%

Basic Materials

4.6%
1.8%

Real Estate

1.9%
11.3%

Financial Services

RFDI
27.2%
EFAS
30.1%

Energy

RFDI
11.5%
EFAS
13.7%

Industrials

RFDI
11.3%
EFAS
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

RFDI
10.2%
EFAS
1.9%

Healthcare

RFDI
8.8%
EFAS
0.1%

Technology

RFDI
7.9%
EFAS
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

RFDI
7.0%
EFAS
8.1%

Communication Services

RFDI
4.8%
EFAS
8.6%

Utilities

RFDI
4.7%
EFAS
14.4%

Basic Materials

RFDI
4.6%
EFAS
1.8%

Real Estate

RFDI
1.9%
EFAS
11.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RFDI vs. EFAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFDI
RFDI Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
RFDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFDI Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
RFDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFDI Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

EFAS
EFAS Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
EFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFDI vs. EFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Developed International ETF (RFDI) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RFDIEFASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.47

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

5.44

-3.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.55

14.48

-5.93

RFDI vs. EFAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFDI Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is lower than the EFAS Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFDI and EFAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RFDIEFASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.67

2.73

-1.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.78

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.56

-0.07

Drawdowns

RFDI vs. EFAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFDI drawdown since its inception was -39.40%, smaller than the maximum EFAS drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFDI and EFAS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RFDIEFASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.40%

-44.38%

+4.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.20%

-5.30%

-4.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.44%

-11.84%

-1.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.87%

-28.81%

-7.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.51%

-3.01%

+0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.24%

-7.08%

-2.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

1.99%

+0.82%

Volatility

RFDI vs. EFAS - Volatility Comparison

First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Developed International ETF (RFDI) has a higher volatility of 4.65% compared to Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) at 2.96%. This indicates that RFDI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RFDIEFASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.65%

2.96%

+1.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.90%

8.20%

+3.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.39%

10.60%

+3.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.76%

15.59%

+1.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.36%

18.33%

-0.97%

RFDI vs. EFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFDI has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than EFAS's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

RFDI vs. EFAS - Dividend Comparison

RFDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, less than EFAS's 5.05% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EFAS
Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF
5.05%4.83%6.76%6.33%7.28%5.19%4.34%5.75%6.63%6.15%0.21%
RFDI
First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Developed International ETF
3.28%3.45%5.21%2.43%5.00%3.22%1.34%2.72%2.59%1.63%1.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


RFDI and EFAS have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RFDI has higher volatility (4.65%) compared to EFAS (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFDI dropped -39.40% vs EFAS's -44.38%.

On 5-year performance, EFAS leads with 12.04% vs 8.07% for RFDI. On fees, EFAS is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, EFAS has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EFAS has performed better with a 12.04% return vs 8.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EFAS is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.83% for RFDI.

EFAS has the higher dividend yield at 5.05%, compared with 3.28% for RFDI.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.83% for RFDI and 0.56% for EFAS.

EFAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RFDI and EFAS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer