PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RFDI vs. FDEV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RFDI vs. FDEV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Developed International ETF (RFDI) and Fidelity International Multifactor ETF (FDEV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFDI achieves a 7.65% return, which is significantly higher than FDEV's 3.89% return.


RFDI

1D
-0.69%
1M
1.91%
YTD
7.65%
6M
10.55%
1Y
23.94%
3Y*
19.21%
5Y*
8.07%
10Y*
8.56%

FDEV

1D
-0.50%
1M
-1.71%
YTD
3.89%
6M
6.83%
1Y
15.07%
3Y*
14.70%
5Y*
7.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFDI vs. FDEV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
RFDI
First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Developed International ETF
7.65%35.95%5.56%18.14%-23.57%17.36%9.16%9.11%
FDEV
Fidelity International Multifactor ETF
3.89%30.36%5.84%13.37%-16.54%11.00%5.49%10.06%

Correlation

The correlation between RFDI and FDEV is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2019

0.91

The correlation between RFDI and FDEV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

RFDI vs. FDEV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RFDI
FDEV

Financial Services

27.2%
21.9%

Energy

11.5%
10.8%

Industrials

11.3%
15.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
4.5%

Healthcare

8.8%
13.3%

Technology

7.9%
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

7.0%
9.5%

Communication Services

4.8%
7.2%

Utilities

4.7%
8.1%

Basic Materials

4.6%
4.1%

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Financial Services

RFDI
27.2%
FDEV
21.9%

Energy

RFDI
11.5%
FDEV
10.8%

Industrials

RFDI
11.3%
FDEV
15.9%

Consumer Cyclical

RFDI
10.2%
FDEV
4.5%

Healthcare

RFDI
8.8%
FDEV
13.3%

Technology

RFDI
7.9%
FDEV
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

RFDI
7.0%
FDEV
9.5%

Communication Services

RFDI
4.8%
FDEV
7.2%

Utilities

RFDI
4.7%
FDEV
8.1%

Basic Materials

RFDI
4.6%
FDEV
4.1%

Real Estate

RFDI
1.9%
FDEV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RFDI vs. FDEV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFDI
RFDI Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
RFDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFDI Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
RFDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFDI Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

FDEV
FDEV Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FDEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDEV Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FDEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDEV Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFDI vs. FDEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Developed International ETF (RFDI) and Fidelity International Multifactor ETF (FDEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RFDIFDEVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.67

1.28

+0.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.35

1.82

+0.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.23

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

1.79

+0.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.55

6.78

+1.77

RFDI vs. FDEV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFDI Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is higher than the FDEV Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFDI and FDEV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RFDIFDEVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.67

1.28

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.51

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.52

-0.03

Drawdowns

RFDI vs. FDEV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFDI drawdown since its inception was -39.40%, which is greater than FDEV's maximum drawdown of -30.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFDI and FDEV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RFDIFDEVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.40%

-30.11%

-9.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.20%

-8.46%

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.44%

-10.47%

-2.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.87%

-29.02%

-6.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.51%

-4.78%

+2.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.24%

-6.29%

-2.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

2.23%

+0.58%

Volatility

RFDI vs. FDEV - Volatility Comparison

First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Developed International ETF (RFDI) has a higher volatility of 4.65% compared to Fidelity International Multifactor ETF (FDEV) at 3.61%. This indicates that RFDI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RFDIFDEVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.65%

3.61%

+1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.90%

9.68%

+2.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.39%

11.90%

+2.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.76%

13.90%

+2.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.36%

15.33%

+2.03%

RFDI vs. FDEV - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFDI has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than FDEV's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

RFDI vs. FDEV - Dividend Comparison

RFDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, more than FDEV's 2.83% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FDEV
Fidelity International Multifactor ETF
2.83%2.86%2.99%2.80%2.65%2.81%1.88%2.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RFDI
First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Developed International ETF
3.28%3.45%5.21%2.43%5.00%3.22%1.34%2.72%2.59%1.63%1.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


RFDI and FDEV have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RFDI has higher volatility (4.65%) compared to FDEV (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFDI dropped -39.40% vs FDEV's -30.11%.

On 5-year performance, RFDI leads with 8.07% vs 7.01% for FDEV. On fees, FDEV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, FDEV has been the lower-risk option at 3.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, RFDI has performed better with a 8.07% return vs 7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDEV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.83% for RFDI.

RFDI has the higher dividend yield at 3.28%, compared with 2.83% for FDEV.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.83% for RFDI and 0.39% for FDEV.

RFDI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RFDI and FDEV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer