RFDA vs. SCHG

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

RFDA (RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. RFDA is actively managed, while SCHG is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RFDA returned 13.43%/yr vs 18.56%/yr for SCHG. Their correlation of 0.80 means they have usually moved in the same direction. RFDA charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.

Performance

RFDA vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFDA achieves a 15.99% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 9.14% return. Over the past 10 years, RFDA has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 13.43%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.56% annualized return.

RFDA

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: 3.31%
• 6M: 14.27%
• YTD: 15.99%
• 1Y: 26.63%
• 3Y*: 19.35%
• 5Y*: 13.07%
• 10Y*: 13.43%
• ALL TIME*: 13.55%

SCHG

• 1D: 1.89%
• 1M: 4.10%
• 6M: 13.23%
• YTD: 9.14%
• 1Y: 18.46%
• 3Y*: 24.14%
• 5Y*: 13.74%
• 10Y*: 18.56%
• ALL TIME*: 16.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF	$111.59K	$107.70K	$119.19K
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	$253.95M	$251.67M	$339.26M

RFDA vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF	15.99%	16.42%	20.12%	16.98%	-8.58%	25.94%	11.26%	27.15%	-9.27%	19.86%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	9.14%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	28.11%	39.14%	36.02%	-1.36%	28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between RFDA and SCHG is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.78
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 2016	0.80

The correlation between RFDA and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.81 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RFDA vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RFDA	SCHG
Financial Services	18.8%	7.7%
Technology	15.4%	44.0%
Healthcare	12.2%	9.9%
Energy	11.1%	0.9%
Industrials	9.3%	7.6%
Consumer Cyclical	8.1%	11.2%
Consumer Defensive	7.1%	1.9%
Communication Services	6.2%	14.1%
Real Estate	5.1%	0.6%
Utilities	4.9%	0.5%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.6%

Return for Risk

RFDA vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RFDA

RFDA Risk / Return Rank: 89
RFDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
RFDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
RFDA Omega Ratio Rank: 87
RFDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
RFDA Martin Ratio Rank: 92

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 36
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 37
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RFDA vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RFDA	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.31	1.12	+1.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.16	1.59	+1.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.20	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.91	1.13	+3.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.57	3.57	+14.00

RFDA vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFDA Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFDA and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RFDA vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFDA drawdown since its inception was -34.60%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFDA and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	RFDA	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.60%	-34.59%	-0.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.45%	-16.41%	+10.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.35%	-23.39%	+4.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.35%	-34.59%	+15.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.60%	-34.59%	-0.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.70%	-5.19%	+1.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.52%	5.19%	-3.67%

Volatility

RFDA vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) is 2.97%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 4.97%. This indicates that RFDA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RFDA	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.97%	4.97%	-2.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.70%	13.15%	-4.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.66%	16.72%	-5.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.73%	22.46%	-6.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.84%	21.61%	-4.77%

RFDA vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFDA has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

RFDA vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

RFDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, more than SCHG's 0.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF	1.74%	1.89%	2.23%	2.68%	3.57%	1.44%	1.62%	1.87%	2.44%	1.90%	0.98%	0.00%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.37%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RFDA and SCHG in my portfolio?

RFDA and SCHG have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RFDA or SCHG?

SCHG has higher volatility (4.97%) compared to RFDA (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFDA dropped -34.60% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

Which ETF is better, RFDA or SCHG?

On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.56% vs 13.43% for RFDA. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, RFDA has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RFDA or SCHG?

Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.56% return vs 13.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RFDA or SCHG?

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for RFDA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RFDA or SCHG?

RFDA has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 0.37% for SCHG.

What is the main difference between RFDA and SCHG?

They also come from different issuers: SS&C and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for RFDA and 0.04% for SCHG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RFDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.