REXC vs. LITP
REXC (Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF) and LITP (Sprott Lithium Miners ETF) are both Energy Equities funds from Sprott - REXC tracks the Nasdaq Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China Index while LITP tracks the Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.65% expense ratio.
Performance
REXC vs. LITP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
REXC
- 1D
- -4.49%
- 1M
- 2.64%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LITP
- 1D
- -4.66%
- 1M
- -7.17%
- YTD
- 28.96%
- 6M
- 41.58%
- 1Y
- 218.79%
- 3Y*
- -0.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
REXC vs. LITP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
REXC Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF | 7.90% |
LITP Sprott Lithium Miners ETF | 3.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between REXC and LITP is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2026 | 0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REXC vs. LITP — Risk / Return Rank
REXC
LITP
REXC vs. LITP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF (REXC) and Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| REXC | LITP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.55 | -0.07 | +1.62 |
Drawdowns
REXC vs. LITP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REXC drawdown since its inception was -16.41%, smaller than the maximum LITP drawdown of -74.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REXC and LITP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REXC | LITP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.41% | -74.72% | +58.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -31.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -74.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.86% | -14.47% | +9.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.74% | -42.29% | +37.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 10.23% | — |
Volatility
REXC vs. LITP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REXC | LITP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.36% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 39.69% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.48% | 58.34% | -8.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.48% | 47.34% | +2.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.48% | 47.34% | +2.14% |
REXC vs. LITP - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both REXC and LITP have an expense ratio of 0.65%.
Dividends
REXC vs. LITP - Dividend Comparison
REXC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LITP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.74%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LITP Sprott Lithium Miners ETF | 5.74% | 7.41% | 6.55% | 2.80% |
REXC Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REXC and LITP have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.65% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
REXC and LITP have the same expense ratio: 0.65% per year.
LITP has the higher dividend yield at 5.74%, compared with 0.00% for REXC.
REXC tracks Nasdaq Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China Index, while LITP tracks Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross.
Find the right allocation for REXC and LITP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer