LITP vs. SQM

In the year-to-date period, LITP achieves a -16.47% return, which is significantly lower than SQM's -5.86% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current LITP Sharpe Ratio is -1.03, which is lower than the SQM Sharpe Ratio of -0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LITP and SQM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

LITP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.85%, while SQM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum LITP drawdown since its inception was -74.72%, smaller than the maximum SQM drawdown of -80.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LITP and SQM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) has a higher volatility of 9.51% compared to Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM) at 7.77%. This indicates that LITP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.