RETL vs. TMF
RETL (Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares) and TMF (Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RETL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Retail Index (300%), while TMF is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RETL returned -5.15%/yr vs -17.90%/yr for TMF. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. RETL charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for TMF.
Performance
RETL vs. TMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RETL achieves a -2.25% return, which is significantly higher than TMF's -10.63% return. Over the past 10 years, RETL has outperformed TMF with an annualized return of -5.15%, while TMF has yielded a comparatively lower -17.90% annualized return.
RETL
- 1D
- -1.97%
- 1M
- -1.56%
- 6M
- -16.24%
- YTD
- -2.25%
- 1Y
- 5.65%
- 3Y*
- 7.48%
- 5Y*
- -26.88%
- 10Y*
- -5.15%
TMF
- 1D
- -1.85%
- 1M
- -5.74%
- 6M
- -11.74%
- YTD
- -10.63%
- 1Y
- -5.83%
- 3Y*
- -21.26%
- 5Y*
- -33.16%
- 10Y*
- -17.90%
RETL vs. TMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RETL Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares | -2.25% | -5.98% | 9.59% | 33.62% | -80.80% | 101.03% | 63.63% | 23.41% | -35.21% | -1.31% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | -10.63% | -2.94% | -35.95% | -13.01% | -72.60% | -19.80% | 39.02% | 34.75% | -11.01% | 22.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between RETL and TMF is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2010 | -0.15 |
The correlation between RETL and TMF shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RETL vs. TMF — Risk / Return Rank
RETL
TMF
RETL vs. TMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares (RETL) and Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RETL | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 0.99 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.15 | -0.22 | +0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.29 | -0.46 | +0.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RETL vs. TMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RETL drawdown since its inception was -92.00%, roughly equal to the maximum TMF drawdown of -92.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RETL and TMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RETL | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.00% | -92.89% | +0.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.08% | -26.51% | -11.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.72% | -55.14% | -7.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.00% | -88.81% | -3.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.00% | -92.89% | +0.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -83.21% | -92.60% | +9.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.84% | -43.91% | +6.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.29% | 12.82% | +6.47% |
Volatility
RETL vs. TMF - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares (RETL) has a higher volatility of 19.36% compared to Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) at 8.51%. This indicates that RETL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RETL | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.36% | 8.51% | +10.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.59% | 19.94% | +22.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.13% | 27.62% | +33.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 79.46% | 46.54% | +32.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 79.94% | 43.72% | +36.22% |
RETL vs. TMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
RETL has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than TMF's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
RETL vs. TMF - Dividend Comparison
RETL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than TMF's 4.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RETL Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares | 0.51% | 0.58% | 1.13% | 1.35% | 0.71% | 0.22% | 0.19% | 0.92% | 1.19% | 0.01% | 2.60% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | 4.42% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 2.82% | 1.62% | 0.13% | 2.23% | 0.94% | 1.49% | 0.41% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RETL and TMF have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RETL has higher volatility (19.36%) compared to TMF (8.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RETL dropped -92.00% vs TMF's -92.89%.
On 10-year performance, RETL leads with -5.15% vs -17.90% for TMF. On fees, RETL is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, TMF has been the lower-risk option at 8.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RETL has performed better with a -5.15% return vs -17.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RETL is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for TMF.
TMF has the higher dividend yield at 4.42%, compared with 0.51% for RETL.
RETL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TMF is Leveraged Bonds. RETL tracks Russell 1000 Retail Index (300%), while TMF tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 0.99% for RETL and 1.01% for TMF.
RETL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.09 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RETL and TMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer