PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RETL vs. PSI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RETL vs. PSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares (RETL) and Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RETL achieves a 4.29% return, which is significantly lower than PSI's 73.04% return. Over the past 10 years, RETL has underperformed PSI with an annualized return of -4.91%, while PSI has yielded a comparatively higher 30.65% annualized return.


RETL

1D
-2.65%
1M
4.48%
6M
1.86%
YTD
4.29%
1Y
25.37%
3Y*
6.42%
5Y*
-25.86%
10Y*
-4.91%
ALL TIME*
14.86%

PSI

1D
1.16%
1M
-13.65%
6M
46.70%
YTD
73.04%
1Y
132.40%
3Y*
41.83%
5Y*
26.56%
10Y*
30.65%
ALL TIME*
17.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$62.53M$61.83M$72.77M
$3.76M$4.05M$5.48M

RETL vs. PSI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RETL
Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares
4.29%-5.98%9.59%33.62%-80.80%101.03%63.63%23.41%-35.21%-1.31%
PSI
Invesco Semiconductors ETF
73.04%36.32%17.17%49.06%-34.43%46.55%56.75%52.49%-11.55%40.16%

Correlation

The correlation between RETL and PSI is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2010

0.51

Over the past year, the correlation between RETL and PSI has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.51, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

RETL vs. PSI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RETL
PSI

Consumer Cyclical

75.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

18.7%

-

Technology

2.7%
100.0%

Communication Services

1.8%

-

Healthcare

1.6%

-

Energy

0.3%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

1.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

RETL
75.2%
PSI

-

Consumer Defensive

RETL
18.7%
PSI

-

Technology

RETL
2.7%
PSI
100.0%

Communication Services

RETL
1.8%
PSI

-

Healthcare

RETL
1.6%
PSI

-

Energy

RETL
0.3%
PSI

-

Basic Materials

RETL

-

PSI

-

Financial Services

RETL

-

PSI

-

Industrials

RETL

-

PSI
1.6%

Real Estate

RETL

-

PSI

-

Utilities

RETL

-

PSI

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RETL vs. PSI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RETL
RETL Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
RETL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RETL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
RETL Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
RETL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
RETL Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

PSI
PSI Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
PSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSI Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
PSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSI Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RETL vs. PSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares (RETL) and Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RETLPSIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.38

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.59

3.64

-3.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.15

16.65

-15.50

RETL vs. PSI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RETL Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the PSI Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RETL and PSI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RETL vs. PSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RETL drawdown since its inception was -92.00%, which is greater than PSI's maximum drawdown of -62.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RETL and PSI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RETLPSIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.00%

-62.96%

-29.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.08%

-35.74%

-2.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.72%

-41.07%

-21.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.00%

-44.85%

-47.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.00%

-44.85%

-47.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-82.09%

-27.36%

-54.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.99%

-15.91%

-22.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.45%

7.80%

+11.65%

Volatility

RETL vs. PSI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares (RETL) is 17.87%, while Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) has a volatility of 24.37%. This indicates that RETL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RETLPSIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.87%

24.37%

-6.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.19%

43.89%

+0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.62%

50.15%

+11.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

79.45%

40.59%

+38.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

80.05%

36.55%

+43.50%

RETL vs. PSI - Expense Ratio Comparison

RETL has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than PSI's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

RETL vs. PSI - Dividend Comparison

RETL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, more than PSI's 0.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSI
Invesco Semiconductors ETF
0.04%0.10%0.15%0.40%0.61%0.14%0.21%0.52%0.83%0.21%0.68%0.16%
RETL
Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares
0.48%0.58%1.13%1.35%0.71%0.22%0.19%0.92%1.19%0.01%2.60%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RETL and PSI have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSI has higher volatility (24.37%) compared to RETL (17.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RETL dropped -92.00% vs PSI's -62.96%.

On 10-year performance, PSI leads with 30.65% vs -4.91% for RETL. On fees, PSI is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, RETL has been the lower-risk option at 17.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PSI has performed better with a 30.65% return vs -4.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PSI is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for RETL.

RETL has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.04% for PSI.

RETL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while PSI is Semiconductors. RETL tracks Russell 1000 Retail Index (300%), while PSI tracks Dynamic Semiconductors Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for RETL and 0.56% for PSI.

PSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RETL and PSI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer