PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RETL vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RETL vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares (RETL) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RETL achieves a -12.88% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 65.71% return. Over the past 10 years, RETL has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of -5.53%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 45.44% annualized return.


RETL

1D
1.39%
1M
-8.46%
YTD
-12.88%
6M
-10.06%
1Y
8.48%
3Y*
12.96%
5Y*
-28.26%
10Y*
-5.53%

TQQQ

1D
1.37%
1M
33.57%
YTD
65.71%
6M
58.23%
1Y
145.30%
3Y*
69.92%
5Y*
29.86%
10Y*
45.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RETL vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RETL
Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares
-12.88%-5.98%9.59%33.62%-80.80%101.03%63.63%23.41%-35.21%-1.31%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
65.71%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between RETL and TQQQ is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2010

0.59

The correlation between RETL and TQQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.62 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RETL vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RETL
TQQQ

Consumer Cyclical

14.0%
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
7.7%

Communication Services

0.3%
15.8%

Technology

0.3%
53.8%

Healthcare

0.3%
4.2%

Energy

0.3%
0.6%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Industrials

-

2.8%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

RETL
14.0%
TQQQ
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

RETL
3.9%
TQQQ
7.7%

Communication Services

RETL
0.3%
TQQQ
15.8%

Technology

RETL
0.3%
TQQQ
53.8%

Healthcare

RETL
0.3%
TQQQ
4.2%

Energy

RETL
0.3%
TQQQ
0.6%

Basic Materials

RETL

-

TQQQ
1.1%

Financial Services

RETL

-

TQQQ
0.2%

Industrials

RETL

-

TQQQ
2.8%

Real Estate

RETL

-

TQQQ
0.1%

Utilities

RETL

-

TQQQ
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RETL vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RETL
RETL Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
RETL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RETL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
RETL Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
RETL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
RETL Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RETL vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares (RETL) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RETLTQQQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.14

3.07

-2.93

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.65

3.19

-2.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.42

-0.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.26

4.08

-3.82

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.55

13.38

-12.83

RETL vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RETL Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RETL and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RETLTQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

3.07

-2.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.36

0.45

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.07

0.69

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.74

-0.54

Drawdowns

RETL vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RETL drawdown since its inception was -92.00%, which is greater than TQQQ's maximum drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RETL and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RETLTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.00%

-81.66%

-10.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.08%

-36.97%

-1.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.72%

-58.04%

-4.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.00%

-81.66%

-10.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.00%

-81.66%

-10.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-85.04%

0.00%

-85.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.54%

-18.53%

-19.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.11%

11.28%

+6.83%

Volatility

RETL vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares (RETL) has a higher volatility of 20.25% compared to ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) at 13.26%. This indicates that RETL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RETLTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.25%

13.26%

+6.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.17%

36.05%

+4.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.15%

47.63%

+12.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

79.51%

66.55%

+12.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

79.76%

65.98%

+13.78%

RETL vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RETL has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

RETL vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

RETL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, more than TQQQ's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RETL
Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares
0.59%0.58%1.13%1.35%0.71%0.22%0.19%0.92%1.19%0.01%2.60%0.00%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.36%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


RETL and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RETL has higher volatility (20.25%) compared to TQQQ (13.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RETL dropped -92.00% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 45.44% vs -5.53% for RETL. On fees, TQQQ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, TQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 13.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 45.44% return vs -5.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TQQQ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for RETL.

RETL has the higher dividend yield at 0.59%, compared with 0.36% for TQQQ.

RETL tracks Russell 1000 Retail Index (300%), while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for RETL and 0.95% for TQQQ.

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RETL and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer