PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RETL vs. EDC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RETL vs. EDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares (RETL) and Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RETL achieves a -12.88% return, which is significantly lower than EDC's 89.44% return. Over the past 10 years, RETL has underperformed EDC with an annualized return of -5.53%, while EDC has yielded a comparatively higher 9.11% annualized return.


RETL

1D
1.39%
1M
-8.46%
YTD
-12.88%
6M
-10.06%
1Y
8.48%
3Y*
12.96%
5Y*
-28.26%
10Y*
-5.53%

EDC

1D
3.04%
1M
30.58%
YTD
89.44%
6M
100.41%
1Y
214.16%
3Y*
54.59%
5Y*
1.07%
10Y*
9.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RETL vs. EDC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RETL
Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares
-12.88%-5.98%9.59%33.62%-80.80%101.03%63.63%23.41%-35.21%-1.31%
EDC
Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares
89.44%94.58%-2.00%7.48%-60.25%-20.81%6.49%43.92%-49.87%138.61%

Correlation

The correlation between RETL and EDC is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2010

0.49

The correlation between RETL and EDC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

RETL vs. EDC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RETL
EDC

Consumer Cyclical

14.0%
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
3.2%

Communication Services

0.3%
7.8%

Technology

0.3%
32.7%

Healthcare

0.3%
3.2%

Energy

0.3%
4.4%

Basic Materials

-

7.0%

Financial Services

-

20.8%

Industrials

-

7.3%

Real Estate

-

1.1%

Utilities

-

2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

RETL
14.0%
EDC
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

RETL
3.9%
EDC
3.2%

Communication Services

RETL
0.3%
EDC
7.8%

Technology

RETL
0.3%
EDC
32.7%

Healthcare

RETL
0.3%
EDC
3.2%

Energy

RETL
0.3%
EDC
4.4%

Basic Materials

RETL

-

EDC
7.0%

Financial Services

RETL

-

EDC
20.8%

Industrials

RETL

-

EDC
7.3%

Real Estate

RETL

-

EDC
1.1%

Utilities

RETL

-

EDC
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RETL vs. EDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RETL
RETL Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
RETL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RETL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
RETL Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
RETL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
RETL Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

EDC
EDC Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
EDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDC Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
EDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDC Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RETL vs. EDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares (RETL) and Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RETLEDCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.14

3.62

-3.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.65

3.46

-2.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.48

-0.41

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.26

5.80

-5.53

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.55

20.45

-19.90

RETL vs. EDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RETL Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the EDC Sharpe Ratio of 3.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RETL and EDC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RETLEDCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

3.62

-3.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.36

0.02

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.07

0.15

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.05

+0.15

Drawdowns

RETL vs. EDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RETL drawdown since its inception was -92.00%, roughly equal to the maximum EDC drawdown of -92.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RETL and EDC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RETLEDCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.00%

-92.54%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.08%

-37.98%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.72%

-49.48%

-13.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.00%

-80.99%

-11.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.00%

-87.01%

-4.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-85.04%

-59.79%

-25.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.54%

-65.36%

+27.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.11%

10.77%

+7.34%

Volatility

RETL vs. EDC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares (RETL) is 20.25%, while Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) has a volatility of 25.34%. This indicates that RETL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RETLEDCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.25%

25.34%

-5.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.17%

51.76%

-11.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.15%

59.53%

+0.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

79.51%

56.68%

+22.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

79.76%

60.69%

+19.07%

RETL vs. EDC - Expense Ratio Comparison

RETL has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than EDC's 1.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

RETL vs. EDC - Dividend Comparison

RETL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than EDC's 0.90% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EDC
Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares
0.90%1.79%3.94%3.54%0.00%0.18%0.44%0.97%0.78%0.25%0.00%
RETL
Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares
0.59%0.58%1.13%1.35%0.71%0.22%0.19%0.92%1.19%0.01%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


RETL and EDC have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EDC has higher volatility (25.34%) compared to RETL (20.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RETL dropped -92.00% vs EDC's -92.54%.

On 10-year performance, EDC leads with 9.11% vs -5.53% for RETL. On fees, RETL is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, RETL has been the lower-risk option at 20.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EDC has performed better with a 9.11% return vs -5.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RETL is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.33% for EDC.

EDC has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.59% for RETL.

RETL tracks Russell 1000 Retail Index (300%), while EDC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 0.99% for RETL and 1.33% for EDC.

EDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.62 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RETL and EDC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer