REMIX vs. NU
REMIX (Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Investor Class) is Macro Trading fund managed by Standpoint Asset Management, while NU (Nu Holdings Ltd.) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, REMIX returned 10.77%/yr vs 15.70%/yr for NU. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
REMIX vs. NU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REMIX achieves a 13.77% return, which is significantly higher than NU's -30.70% return.
REMIX
- 1D
- -2.27%
- 1M
- -1.70%
- YTD
- 13.77%
- 6M
- 15.58%
- 1Y
- 27.65%
- 3Y*
- 10.77%
- 5Y*
- 8.63%
- 10Y*
- —
NU
- 1D
- -3.09%
- 1M
- -15.94%
- YTD
- -30.70%
- 6M
- -30.20%
- 1Y
- -4.53%
- 3Y*
- 15.70%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
REMIX vs. NU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REMIX Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Investor Class | 13.77% | 3.85% | 12.92% | 5.53% | 3.44% | 0.62% |
NU Nu Holdings Ltd. | -30.70% | 61.58% | 24.37% | 104.67% | -56.61% | -9.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between REMIX and NU is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2021 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REMIX vs. NU — Risk / Return Rank
REMIX
NU
REMIX vs. NU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Investor Class (REMIX) and Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| REMIX | NU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.01 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.83 | -0.12 | +5.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.59 | -0.31 | +18.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| REMIX | NU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.16 | -0.12 | +2.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | 0.05 | +0.94 |
Drawdowns
REMIX vs. NU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REMIX drawdown since its inception was -17.89%, smaller than the maximum NU drawdown of -72.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REMIX and NU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REMIX | NU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.89% | -72.07% | +54.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.78% | -38.17% | +33.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.89% | -39.58% | +21.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.90% | -38.17% | +34.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.29% | -29.77% | +26.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.50% | 14.69% | -13.19% |
Volatility
REMIX vs. NU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Investor Class (REMIX) is 3.71%, while Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) has a volatility of 14.24%. This indicates that REMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REMIX | NU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.71% | 14.24% | -10.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.77% | 28.87% | -19.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.90% | 39.10% | -26.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.71% | 58.43% | -46.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.79% | 58.43% | -46.64% |
Dividends
REMIX vs. NU - Dividend Comparison
REMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, while NU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NU Nu Holdings Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
REMIX Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Investor Class | 0.41% | 0.47% | 5.52% | 3.46% | 2.48% | 6.04% | 1.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REMIX and NU have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NU has higher volatility (14.24%) compared to REMIX (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REMIX dropped -17.89% vs NU's -72.07%.
REMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for REMIX and NU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer