PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REMIX vs. NU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REMIX vs. NU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Investor Class (REMIX) and Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REMIX achieves a 9.77% return, which is significantly higher than NU's -21.57% return.


REMIX

1D
-0.74%
1M
-4.88%
YTD
9.77%
6M
9.32%
1Y
25.05%
3Y*
9.24%
5Y*
7.83%
10Y*

NU

1D
-0.30%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
-21.57%
6M
-21.19%
1Y
-0.91%
3Y*
18.50%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REMIX vs. NU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
REMIX
Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Investor Class
9.77%3.85%12.92%5.53%3.44%-0.18%
NU
Nu Holdings Ltd.
-21.57%61.58%24.37%104.67%-56.61%-16.62%

Correlation

The correlation between REMIX and NU is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2021

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REMIX vs. NU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REMIX
REMIX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
REMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
REMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
REMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
REMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

NU
NU Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
NU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
NU Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
NU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
NU Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REMIX vs. NU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Investor Class (REMIX) and Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


REMIXNUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.03

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

-0.02

+3.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.38

-0.05

+13.43

REMIX vs. NU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REMIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the NU Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REMIX and NU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

REMIX vs. NU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REMIX drawdown since its inception was -17.89%, smaller than the maximum NU drawdown of -72.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REMIX and NU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REMIXNUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.89%

-72.07%

+54.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.28%

-38.17%

+30.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.89%

-39.58%

+21.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.28%

-30.01%

+22.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.30%

-29.79%

+26.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

16.64%

-14.78%

Volatility

REMIX vs. NU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Investor Class (REMIX) is 3.90%, while Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) has a volatility of 13.84%. This indicates that REMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REMIXNUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.90%

13.84%

-9.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.01%

29.35%

-19.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.87%

37.57%

-24.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.75%

58.32%

-46.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.80%

58.32%

-46.52%

Dividends

REMIX vs. NU - Dividend Comparison

REMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, while NU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
NU
Nu Holdings Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
REMIX
Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Investor Class
0.43%0.47%5.52%3.46%2.48%6.04%1.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


REMIX and NU have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NU has higher volatility (13.84%) compared to REMIX (3.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REMIX dropped -17.89% vs NU's -72.07%.

REMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REMIX and NU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer